Experiences of discrimination and positive treatment among people who support a person with a mental health condition: a nationally representative survey

PURPOSE: Stigma and discrimination compound the burden experienced by informal caregivers of people with mental illness, impacting their wellbeing. Prior caregiver stigma research has relied on qualitative or convenience samples, limiting knowledge of groups most affected. This Australian study is the first nationally representative survey of caregiver experiences of discrimination and positive treatment. METHODS: Participants (N = 2,164) were recruited from a probability-based online panel using stratified random sampling and weighting for age, gender, education, and language background. Descriptive statistics examined prevalence of stigma, discrimination and positive treatment experiences. Multiple regression models were used to assess sociodemographic differences in experiences and associations with psychological distress and wellbeing. RESULTS: Positive treatment experiences were common, with 67.9% (95% CI: 65.4, 70.2) of caregivers reporting understanding from friends and family and 59.6% (95% CI: 57.1, 62.1) feeling valued by the care recipient's treating team. However, 34.3% (95% CI: 31.9, 36.8) reported role concealment, and 18.8% (95% CI: 16.8, 20.9) unfavourable treatment at least sometimes. Positive treatment experiences were more prevalent among caregivers who were older or with higher levels of education, whereas experiences of discrimination were more common among caregivers from non-English speaking backgrounds. Women were less likely to conceal their caregiving role. Positive treatment was associated with lower distress and higher wellbeing, whereas discrimination was associated with higher distress and lower wellbeing. CONCLUSION: Despite encouraging levels of support, experiences of caregiver discrimination are common and impact on psychological distress and wellbeing. Multi-pronged strategies are needed to address inequities, strengthen peer support and caregiver-inclusive practice frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-026-03137-w
Primary Topic
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of discrimination and positive treatment among people who support a person with a mental health condition: a nationally representative survey

Nicola Reavley, Christopher Rainbow, Amy J. Morgan, Gayle McNaught et al.
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
article

Experiences of discrimination and positive treatment among people who support a person with a mental health condition: a nationally representative survey

Nicola Reavley, Christopher Rainbow, Amy J. Morgan, Gayle McNaught, Rachel Green
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stigma and discrimination compound the burden experienced by informal caregivers of people with mental illness, impacting their wellbeing. Prior caregiver stigma research has relied on qualitative or convenience samples, limiting knowledge of groups most affected. This Australian study is the first nationally representative survey of caregiver experiences of discrimination and positive treatment. METHODS: Participants (N = 2,164) were recruited from a probability-based online panel using stratified random sampling and weighting for age, gender, education, and language background. Descriptive statistics examined prevalence of stigma, discrimination and positive treatment experiences. Multiple regression models were used to assess sociodemographic differences in experiences and associations with psychological distress and wellbeing. RESULTS: Positive treatment experiences were common, with 67.9% (95% CI: 65.4, 70.2) of caregivers reporting understanding from friends and family and 59.6% (95% CI: 57.1, 62.1) feeling valued by the care recipient's treating team. However, 34.3% (95% CI: 31.9, 36.8) reported role concealment, and 18.8% (95% CI: 16.8, 20.9) unfavourable treatment at least sometimes. Positive treatment experiences were more prevalent among caregivers who were older or with higher levels of education, whereas experiences of discrimination were more common among caregivers from non-English speaking backgrounds. Women were less likely to conceal their caregiving role. Positive treatment was associated with lower distress and higher wellbeing, whereas discrimination was associated with higher distress and lower wellbeing. CONCLUSION: Despite encouraging levels of support, experiences of caregiver discrimination are common and impact on psychological distress and wellbeing. Multi-pronged strategies are needed to address inequities, strengthen peer support and caregiver-inclusive practice frameworks.

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
SANE Mental Health Charity (GB), Melbourne Health (AU)
Veski, University of Melbourne
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.