General Principles of International Law and the EU’s Legal Order

General principles of international law (GPIL) occupy a central but underexplored position in the European Union’s legal order. Despite their acknowledged role in international law, the definition, origin, and functions of GPIL remain contested. This article examines the interaction between GPIL and the EU legal system, with particular attention to the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It first situates GPIL within the EU’s constitutional framework, highlighting their ambiguous legal status. It then explores how the CJEU has relied upon, adapted, or resisted GPIL, both as sources of inspiration for general principles of EU law (GPEU) and as constraints within the EU’s autonomous legal order. While instances of reluctance or resistance reveal the Court’s concern for safeguarding EU autonomy, GPIL continue to provide interpretative guidance, systemic coherence, and bridges between EU and international law. The analysis ultimately demonstrates that the EU’s engagement with GPIL contributes to both the development of its own legal order and the broader coherence of international law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/896
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

General Principles of International Law and the EU’s Legal Order

Eva Kassoti, Ramses A. Wessel
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
International Law and Human Rights
article

General Principles of International Law and the EU’s Legal Order

Eva Kassoti, Ramses A. Wessel
article en

Abstract

General principles of international law (GPIL) occupy a central but underexplored position in the European Union’s legal order. Despite their acknowledged role in international law, the definition, origin, and functions of GPIL remain contested. This article examines the interaction between GPIL and the EU legal system, with particular attention to the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It first situates GPIL within the EU’s constitutional framework, highlighting their ambiguous legal status. It then explores how the CJEU has relied upon, adapted, or resisted GPIL, both as sources of inspiration for general principles of EU law (GPEU) and as constraints within the EU’s autonomous legal order. While instances of reluctance or resistance reveal the Court’s concern for safeguarding EU autonomy, GPIL continue to provide interpretative guidance, systemic coherence, and bridges between EU and international law. The analysis ultimately demonstrates that the EU’s engagement with GPIL contributes to both the development of its own legal order and the broader coherence of international law.

Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
University of Groningen (NL), Asser Institute (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

General Principles of International Law and the EU’s Legal Order — Eva Kassoti, Ramses A. Wessel · Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza” (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS