Safety and Feasibility of Sleeve Gastrectomy Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass: An MBSAQIP Analysis

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most common bariatric procedure worldwide. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients require conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) because of recurrent weight gain. This study aimed to determine the rates of complications and mortality associated with conversion from SG to RYGB (SG-RYGB) compared with conversion from SG to SADI (SG-SADI). Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database from 2020 to 2022. Patients undergoing SG-RYGB or SG-SADI were included. Thirty-day operative outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative events, and mortality were analyzed. Results: A total of 28,758 patients were included. Of these, 27,412 (95.3%) underwent SG-RYGB and 1346 (4.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean preoperative body mass index was 39.7 kg/m 2 for SG-RYGB and 45.3 kg/m 2 for SG-SADI ( P < .001). SG-RYGB was associated with a higher frequency of intraoperative/postoperative complications within the first 30 days (5.9% versus 3.4%, P < .001), including transfusion (1.3% versus 0.4%, P = .004), readmission (7.3% versus 4.6%, P < .001), and emergency department visits (12.5% versus 8.5%, P < .001). Although SG-SADI was associated with a higher rate of anastomotic leak (0.4% versus 1.1%, P < .001), there was no difference in reoperation rates (2.8% versus 2.5%) or deaths (0.02% versus 0%). Overall, SG-SADI-S was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative/postoperative complications, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.741 (95% confidence interval: 0.543–0.901, P = .041). Conclusions: Both revisional procedures are safe. Although SG-RYGB was associated with a higher frequency of intraoperative/postoperative complications within the first 30 days, SG-SADI had a higher rate of anastomotic leaks, with no difference in reoperation rates or deaths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261458534
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Feasibility of Sleeve Gastrectomy Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass: An MBSAQIP Analysis

Arturo Estrada, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Valentina Viscarret, Jenny Choi et al.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Safety and Feasibility of Sleeve Gastrectomy Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass: An MBSAQIP Analysis

Arturo Estrada, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Valentina Viscarret, Jenny Choi, Diego Camacho, Erin Moran-Atkin
article en

Abstract

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most common bariatric procedure worldwide. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients require conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) because of recurrent weight gain. This study aimed to determine the rates of complications and mortality associated with conversion from SG to RYGB (SG-RYGB) compared with conversion from SG to SADI (SG-SADI). Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database from 2020 to 2022. Patients undergoing SG-RYGB or SG-SADI were included. Thirty-day operative outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative events, and mortality were analyzed. Results: A total of 28,758 patients were included. Of these, 27,412 (95.3%) underwent SG-RYGB and 1346 (4.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean preoperative body mass index was 39.7 kg/m 2 for SG-RYGB and 45.3 kg/m 2 for SG-SADI ( P < .001). SG-RYGB was associated with a higher frequency of intraoperative/postoperative complications within the first 30 days (5.9% versus 3.4%, P < .001), including transfusion (1.3% versus 0.4%, P = .004), readmission (7.3% versus 4.6%, P < .001), and emergency department visits (12.5% versus 8.5%, P < .001). Although SG-SADI was associated with a higher rate of anastomotic leak (0.4% versus 1.1%, P < .001), there was no difference in reoperation rates (2.8% versus 2.5%) or deaths (0.02% versus 0%). Overall, SG-SADI-S was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative/postoperative complications, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.741 (95% confidence interval: 0.543–0.901, P = .041). Conclusions: Both revisional procedures are safe. Although SG-RYGB was associated with a higher frequency of intraoperative/postoperative complications within the first 30 days, SG-SADI had a higher rate of anastomotic leaks, with no difference in reoperation rates or deaths.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Montefiore Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.