Validity and reliability of the Amharic version Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) in pediatric oncology

BACKGROUND: The short form of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) has been frequently used for assessing anxiety and depression in clinical and community samples. However, the Amharic version of RCADS-25 (RCADS-25(A)) has not been validated. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of RCADS-25(A) in pediatric oncology. METHODS: This study included 142 children aged 8-18 years. The reliability of the scale was assessed by calculating internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the RCADS-25(A) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the two-factor structure of RCADS-25 identified in the original version. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 11.6 ± 3.2 years. The RCADS-25(A) demonstrated evidence of good validity and reliability. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.95, 0.94, and 0.96 for the anxiety subscale, depression subscale, and total scale, respectively, while intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.81, 0.80, and 0.87 for the same domains, indicating good test-retest reliability. The RCADS-25(A) correlated significantly with PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS (r = -0.97, p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor model (χ2/df = 1.44; CFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.06; SRMR = 0.05; TLI = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The RCADS-25(A) appears to demonstrate promising validity and reliability, suggesting its potential utility for assessing anxiety and depression in pediatric oncology. The findings underscore the need for further validation studies employing larger and more diverse samples, as well as the adoption of multimethod assessment approaches. The use of parent-report versions and studies in other populations and Ethiopian languages are highlighted to further establish the scale's psychometric properties and cross-cultural applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04922-7
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of the Amharic version Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) in pediatric oncology

Abdulkadir Gidey, Tenaw Gualu Melesse, Janita Pak Chun Chau, Mulugeta Ayalew Yimer et al.
BMC Psychology
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Validity and reliability of the Amharic version Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) in pediatric oncology

Abdulkadir Gidey, Tenaw Gualu Melesse, Janita Pak Chun Chau, Mulugeta Ayalew Yimer, KC Choi, William Ho Cheung Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The short form of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) has been frequently used for assessing anxiety and depression in clinical and community samples. However, the Amharic version of RCADS-25 (RCADS-25(A)) has not been validated. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of RCADS-25(A) in pediatric oncology. METHODS: This study included 142 children aged 8-18 years. The reliability of the scale was assessed by calculating internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the RCADS-25(A) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the two-factor structure of RCADS-25 identified in the original version. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 11.6 ± 3.2 years. The RCADS-25(A) demonstrated evidence of good validity and reliability. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.95, 0.94, and 0.96 for the anxiety subscale, depression subscale, and total scale, respectively, while intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.81, 0.80, and 0.87 for the same domains, indicating good test-retest reliability. The RCADS-25(A) correlated significantly with PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS (r = -0.97, p < 0.001). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor model (χ2/df = 1.44; CFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.06; SRMR = 0.05; TLI = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The RCADS-25(A) appears to demonstrate promising validity and reliability, suggesting its potential utility for assessing anxiety and depression in pediatric oncology. The findings underscore the need for further validation studies employing larger and more diverse samples, as well as the adoption of multimethod assessment approaches. The use of parent-report versions and studies in other populations and Ethiopian languages are highlighted to further establish the scale's psychometric properties and cross-cultural applicability.

BMC Psychology
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Addis Ababa University (ET), University of Gondar (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.