Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: patient-reported outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the RATIONALE-305 study

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the Asian subgroup of patients from the RATIONALE-305 (NCT03777657) trial. METHODS: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic GC/GEJC were randomized (1:1) to receive either tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo IV once every 3 weeks, in combination with investigator-choice chemotherapy. PROs were evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 questionnaires. Least-squares mean score changes from baseline to key clinical Cycles 4 and 6 were assessed using a mixed model for repeated measures. Time-to-deterioration (TTD) was also examined. RESULTS: This analysis included 748 Asian patients (376 in the tislelizumab arm; 372 in the placebo arm). At Cycle 4, both arms experienced clinically meaningful improvements in pain, with tislelizumab demonstrating significantly greater improvement than placebo. At Cycle 6, only the tislelizumab arm continued to show clinically meaningful improvement in pain. The mean treatment difference was significant for GHS/QoL, with the tislelizumab arm showing significantly greater improvement compared to the placebo arm. TTD analysis further showed that patients receiving tislelizumab had a lower risk of deterioration in QLQ-C30 physical functioning, QLQ-STO22 index score, and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Asian patients receiving tislelizumab with chemotherapy reported better PRO outcomes compared to those receiving placebo with chemotherapy, particularly in GHS/QoL and pain/discomfort. Patients in the tislelizumab arm also experienced a lower risk of deterioration in overall gastric cancer symptoms, upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and physical functioning. These results, consistent with findings from the overall intention-to-treat population, support tislelizumab with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for GC/GEJC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2682010
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: patient-reported outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the RATIONALE-305 study

Frederick B. Barnes, Hidekazu Hirano, Gisoo Barnes, Rui-Hua Xu et al.
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: patient-reported outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the RATIONALE-305 study

Frederick B. Barnes, Hidekazu Hirano, Gisoo Barnes, Rui-Hua Xu, Do-Youn Oh, Yuxian Bai, Tao Sheng, Keun-Wook Lee, Ken Kato, Hui Xu, Jianhua Shi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the Asian subgroup of patients from the RATIONALE-305 (NCT03777657) trial. METHODS: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic GC/GEJC were randomized (1:1) to receive either tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo IV once every 3 weeks, in combination with investigator-choice chemotherapy. PROs were evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 questionnaires. Least-squares mean score changes from baseline to key clinical Cycles 4 and 6 were assessed using a mixed model for repeated measures. Time-to-deterioration (TTD) was also examined. RESULTS: This analysis included 748 Asian patients (376 in the tislelizumab arm; 372 in the placebo arm). At Cycle 4, both arms experienced clinically meaningful improvements in pain, with tislelizumab demonstrating significantly greater improvement than placebo. At Cycle 6, only the tislelizumab arm continued to show clinically meaningful improvement in pain. The mean treatment difference was significant for GHS/QoL, with the tislelizumab arm showing significantly greater improvement compared to the placebo arm. TTD analysis further showed that patients receiving tislelizumab had a lower risk of deterioration in QLQ-C30 physical functioning, QLQ-STO22 index score, and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Asian patients receiving tislelizumab with chemotherapy reported better PRO outcomes compared to those receiving placebo with chemotherapy, particularly in GHS/QoL and pain/discomfort. Patients in the tislelizumab arm also experienced a lower risk of deterioration in overall gastric cancer symptoms, upper gastrointestinal symptoms, and physical functioning. These results, consistent with findings from the overall intention-to-treat population, support tislelizumab with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for GC/GEJC.

Current Medical Research and Opinion
Harbin Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (US), National Cancer Center (US), Cancer Research And Biostatistics (US), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), National University College (PR), Linzhou Cancer Hospital (CN), Clinical Solutions (US), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.