The Requirement of Unity in EU International Representation: A Principle, an Objective or Nothing at All?

This contribution examines the concept of unity in EU international representation and assesses whether it constitutes a principle, an objective, or remains a general aspiration in EU external relations law. The requirement of unity in international representation, while not explicitly mentioned in the Treaties, has emerged through CJEU case law in connection with the sincere cooperation principle under Article 4(3) TEU. The contribution traces the ambivalent and inconsistent application of this concept from its origins in Ruling 1/78 through the subsequent jurisdiction, revealing that the Court has not used it consistently, exceptionally characterising it as a self-standing principle, other times it appears as an objective to be achieved through the sincere cooperation and consistency principles. The contribution proceeds in two main parts. First, it assesses the vertical dimension of unity in international representation between the EU and Member States, examining how this requirement has evolved from an ‘accidental principle’ closely tied to mixed agreements and shared competences and evolving to a more developed concept linked to coherence and effectiveness in EU external action. Second, the article addresses whether unity in international representation could be exported to apply horizontally between EU institutions to bridge the fragmentation in external representation. Drawing on Advocate Opinion in the MoU Switzerland case, it examines whether the requirement of unity in international representation could infuse more coherence into the fragmented external representation system involving the Commission, Council, High Representative, and other global actors. The article ultimately questions whether unity in international representation can serve as a guidance for the application of sincere cooperation and consistency on the horizontal level under the condition of assigning precise powers to EU institutional actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/892
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Requirement of Unity in EU International Representation: A Principle, an Objective or Nothing at All?

Andrea Ott
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The Requirement of Unity in EU International Representation: A Principle, an Objective or Nothing at All?

Andrea Ott
article en

Abstract

This contribution examines the concept of unity in EU international representation and assesses whether it constitutes a principle, an objective, or remains a general aspiration in EU external relations law. The requirement of unity in international representation, while not explicitly mentioned in the Treaties, has emerged through CJEU case law in connection with the sincere cooperation principle under Article 4(3) TEU. The contribution traces the ambivalent and inconsistent application of this concept from its origins in Ruling 1/78 through the subsequent jurisdiction, revealing that the Court has not used it consistently, exceptionally characterising it as a self-standing principle, other times it appears as an objective to be achieved through the sincere cooperation and consistency principles. The contribution proceeds in two main parts. First, it assesses the vertical dimension of unity in international representation between the EU and Member States, examining how this requirement has evolved from an ‘accidental principle’ closely tied to mixed agreements and shared competences and evolving to a more developed concept linked to coherence and effectiveness in EU external action. Second, the article addresses whether unity in international representation could be exported to apply horizontally between EU institutions to bridge the fragmentation in external representation. Drawing on Advocate Opinion in the MoU Switzerland case, it examines whether the requirement of unity in international representation could infuse more coherence into the fragmented external representation system involving the Commission, Council, High Representative, and other global actors. The article ultimately questions whether unity in international representation can serve as a guidance for the application of sincere cooperation and consistency on the horizontal level under the condition of assigning precise powers to EU institutional actors.

Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Maastricht University (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.