Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Venous Excess Ultrasound Grading System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES: The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) grading system has gained recognition in acute and critical care medicine as a promising approach to evaluate venous congestion and optimize fluid management. However, the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of VExUS remain unclear. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Wiley/Cochrane Library from inception to May 19, 2025, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and in collaboration with a medical information specialist. STUDY SELECTION: Study selection was systematically performed by a panel of authors. A total of 32 studies were included, consisting of 3142 patients, with six diagnostic, 22 prognostic studies, and four studies that reported on both diagnostic and prognostic outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were extracted by two authors, and the corresponding authors were contacted when necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: For diagnostic studies, no meta-analysis could be performed. Studies suggest moderate to good diagnostic accuracy for detecting increased central venous and right atrial pressures (sensitivity 78-95%, specificity 80-90%). Prognostic studies in cardiac patients found an association between VExUS greater than or equal to 2 and acute kidney injury (AKI; odds ratio [OR], 4.44; 95% CI, 2.34-8.43; moderate certainty) and mortality (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.30-7.75, low certainty). For critically ill patients, no associations between VExUS greater than or equal to 2 and AKI (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.70-2.99; very low certainty) and mortality (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.77-2.03; low certainty) were found. Per-patient analysis showed an association between VExUS 3 and mortality for all patients and an association with AKI for cardiac patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that VExUS has moderate to good accuracy to diagnose increased central venous pressure and right atrial pressure. In cardiac patients, higher VExUS grades are associated with AKI and mortality, but in critically ill patients, the association between VExUS grades and outcomes is less clear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007219
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Venous Excess Ultrasound Grading System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Peter Klompmaker, MSc Ralph de Vries, Krijna Opschoor, Denise P. Veelo et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Venous Excess Ultrasound Grading System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Peter Klompmaker, MSc Ralph de Vries, Krijna Opschoor, Denise P. Veelo, Pieter R. Tuinman, Johan ten Dalen, Alexander P. J. Vlaar, Cosmin Balan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) grading system has gained recognition in acute and critical care medicine as a promising approach to evaluate venous congestion and optimize fluid management. However, the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of VExUS remain unclear. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Wiley/Cochrane Library from inception to May 19, 2025, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and in collaboration with a medical information specialist. STUDY SELECTION: Study selection was systematically performed by a panel of authors. A total of 32 studies were included, consisting of 3142 patients, with six diagnostic, 22 prognostic studies, and four studies that reported on both diagnostic and prognostic outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were extracted by two authors, and the corresponding authors were contacted when necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: For diagnostic studies, no meta-analysis could be performed. Studies suggest moderate to good diagnostic accuracy for detecting increased central venous and right atrial pressures (sensitivity 78-95%, specificity 80-90%). Prognostic studies in cardiac patients found an association between VExUS greater than or equal to 2 and acute kidney injury (AKI; odds ratio [OR], 4.44; 95% CI, 2.34-8.43; moderate certainty) and mortality (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.30-7.75, low certainty). For critically ill patients, no associations between VExUS greater than or equal to 2 and AKI (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.70-2.99; very low certainty) and mortality (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.77-2.03; low certainty) were found. Per-patient analysis showed an association between VExUS 3 and mortality for all patients and an association with AKI for cardiac patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that VExUS has moderate to good accuracy to diagnose increased central venous pressure and right atrial pressure. In cardiac patients, higher VExUS grades are associated with AKI and mortality, but in critically ill patients, the association between VExUS grades and outcomes is less clear.

Critical Care Medicine
Institutul de Urgenţă pentru Boli Cardiovasculare "Prof.Dr. C.C. Iliescu" (RO), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.