Interrogating neoliberal influences: Reflections on the praxis of occupation-based social transformation

Claims of occupation’s socially transformative potential are long-standing within occupational science. In recent years, efforts have been made to mobilize this potential to enact change across individuals to collectives. Tracing the evolution of English-language, occupation-based scholarship reveals that the literature has been preparatory in relation to social transformation by 1) defining and establishing social transformation as a relevant analytical concept; 2) problematizing occupation to cultivate a context that facilitates social transformation; 3) developing guiding frameworks; 4) capturing transformative experiences; and 5) evaluating existing socially transformative actions. While occupational science scholars have named neoliberal policy as a threat and an instigator of socially transformative mobilizations, analysis of neoliberal influences within these efforts has not yet been undertaken. This paper builds on existing scholarship to interrogate the saturation of neoliberalism in dominant approaches to occupation-based social transformation. We argue that current initiatives 1) reproduce—instead of transform—a neoliberal network of action; 2) lack clarity regarding the function and form of occupation’s socially transformative potential; and 3) prioritize outcomes over process. These insights highlight a conceptual and material absence of explicit engagement, analysis, and confrontation with the political apparatus within social transformation initiatives. This paper sets the stage for ongoing critical dialogue around occupation-based social transformation, ultimately necessitating a transformation of occupational scientists’ shared understanding of pursuing this work together.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational Science
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2026.2667345
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interrogating neoliberal influences: Reflections on the praxis of occupation-based social transformation

Khalilah R. Johnson, Ryan Lavalley, S. Mitchell, S. Schiller
Journal of Occupational Science
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Interrogating neoliberal influences: Reflections on the praxis of occupation-based social transformation

Khalilah R. Johnson, Ryan Lavalley, S. Mitchell, S. Schiller
article en

Abstract

Claims of occupation’s socially transformative potential are long-standing within occupational science. In recent years, efforts have been made to mobilize this potential to enact change across individuals to collectives. Tracing the evolution of English-language, occupation-based scholarship reveals that the literature has been preparatory in relation to social transformation by 1) defining and establishing social transformation as a relevant analytical concept; 2) problematizing occupation to cultivate a context that facilitates social transformation; 3) developing guiding frameworks; 4) capturing transformative experiences; and 5) evaluating existing socially transformative actions. While occupational science scholars have named neoliberal policy as a threat and an instigator of socially transformative mobilizations, analysis of neoliberal influences within these efforts has not yet been undertaken. This paper builds on existing scholarship to interrogate the saturation of neoliberalism in dominant approaches to occupation-based social transformation. We argue that current initiatives 1) reproduce—instead of transform—a neoliberal network of action; 2) lack clarity regarding the function and form of occupation’s socially transformative potential; and 3) prioritize outcomes over process. These insights highlight a conceptual and material absence of explicit engagement, analysis, and confrontation with the political apparatus within social transformation initiatives. This paper sets the stage for ongoing critical dialogue around occupation-based social transformation, ultimately necessitating a transformation of occupational scientists’ shared understanding of pursuing this work together.

Journal of Occupational Science
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.