Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Appalachia exceed national averages, reflecting long-standing inequities in preventive care. Although cervical cancer screening (CCS) effectively reduces morbidity and mortality, participation among Appalachian women remains low. Understanding the multilevel factors that influence screening behavior is critical to inform culturally responsive and sustainable interventions. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize existing evidence on barriers to and facilitators of CCS among women residing in Appalachia using Levesque's Access to Care Framework. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2002 and August 2025. Eligible studies reported original empirical data on CCS among women aged 21-64 living in Appalachian counties. Editorials, reviews, gray literature, and studies lacking disaggregated Appalachian data were excluded. Extracted data were categorized into Levesque's five patient-level domains: the abilities to perceive, seek, reach, pay, and engage in care. RESULTS: Of 3,457 records identified, 27 met inclusion criteria. Studies employed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs. Barriers included cost, lack of insurance, transportation challenges, medical mistrust, fatalism, low health literacy, and negative prior health care experiences. Facilitators included trusted and consistent patient-provider relationships, clear provider communication, social support, female clinician availability, and access to free or subsidized screening through Title X and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program services. DISCUSSION: Structural, interpersonal, and psychosocial factors intersect to shape screening behaviors in Appalachia. Findings highlight the importance of trust-building, trauma-informed, and culturally responsive communication, and system-level supports that address cost and access barriers. Expanding Medicaid, strengthening rural provider capacity, and increasing participation in Title X and national cervical cancer programs may reduce disparities and improve screening uptake. Future research should incorporate standardized measures of trust, health literacy, and psychosocial readiness to strengthen intervention design and cross-study comparability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Research
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nnr.0000000000000923
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia

Leila Ledbetter, Jill E. Sergison, Megan J. Huchko, Eleanor L. Stevenson et al.
Nursing Research
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia

Leila Ledbetter, Jill E. Sergison, Megan J. Huchko, Eleanor L. Stevenson, Amy Alspaugh, Mitchell R. Knisely, Devon Noonan, Sarah E. Janek, Savannah Brinkley
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Appalachia exceed national averages, reflecting long-standing inequities in preventive care. Although cervical cancer screening (CCS) effectively reduces morbidity and mortality, participation among Appalachian women remains low. Understanding the multilevel factors that influence screening behavior is critical to inform culturally responsive and sustainable interventions. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize existing evidence on barriers to and facilitators of CCS among women residing in Appalachia using Levesque's Access to Care Framework. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and reported following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2002 and August 2025. Eligible studies reported original empirical data on CCS among women aged 21-64 living in Appalachian counties. Editorials, reviews, gray literature, and studies lacking disaggregated Appalachian data were excluded. Extracted data were categorized into Levesque's five patient-level domains: the abilities to perceive, seek, reach, pay, and engage in care. RESULTS: Of 3,457 records identified, 27 met inclusion criteria. Studies employed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs. Barriers included cost, lack of insurance, transportation challenges, medical mistrust, fatalism, low health literacy, and negative prior health care experiences. Facilitators included trusted and consistent patient-provider relationships, clear provider communication, social support, female clinician availability, and access to free or subsidized screening through Title X and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program services. DISCUSSION: Structural, interpersonal, and psychosocial factors intersect to shape screening behaviors in Appalachia. Findings highlight the importance of trust-building, trauma-informed, and culturally responsive communication, and system-level supports that address cost and access barriers. Expanding Medicaid, strengthening rural provider capacity, and increasing participation in Title X and national cervical cancer programs may reduce disparities and improve screening uptake. Future research should incorporate standardized measures of trust, health literacy, and psychosocial readiness to strengthen intervention design and cross-study comparability.

Nursing Research
Twitter (United States) (US), Galen University (BZ), Emergent BioSolutions (United States) (US), Artistic Realization Technologies (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.