Determining ICU Staff’s Conceptions, Opinions, Views, Experiences, and Reflection (DISCOVER) of Brain Death—Results From a Swiss Multicenter Survey

Objectives: To assess perceptions, beliefs, and conceptual understanding of brain death among ICU professionals at three Swiss hospitals and to examine their associations with personal, educational, and professional experiences. Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. Setting: Multicenter survey at three Swiss care centers. Subjects: ICU healthcare professionals (i.e., physicians and nurses). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Questionnaires assessed demographics, religious beliefs, professional experience, exposure to brain death cases, knowledge of diagnostic criteria, and emotional and ethical attitudes using closed-ended and semi-open questions, Likert scales (1 = “very unsure,” “absolutely not” to 10 = “very sure,” “absolutely”), and checklists. Endpoints were (primary) perceptions, beliefs, conceptual understanding of brain death, and (secondary) interprofessional differences and associations/correlations with personal, educational, social, and professional factors. Among 338 ICU professionals (78.1% nurses, 74% women), key diagnostic brain death criteria were well recognized, although misconceptions about nonessential tests persisted. Self-perceived understanding and approval were high (both median Likert scores, 9; interquartile range [IQR], 8–10), while agreement that a brain-dead patient is not a patient but a corpse was much lower (median, 1; IQR, 1–4). Physicians showed greater approval than nurses ( p = 0.003) and were more likely to equate brain death with circulatory death ( p < 0.001). Understanding increased with ICU experience (ρ = 0.194) and age (ρ = 0.213; both p < 0.001) and was higher among those with prior exposure to brain death or its diagnostics (both p < 0.001). No significant associations were found for sex, religious beliefs, parenthood, or bereavement. Conclusions: Although Swiss ICU professionals generally endorse and understand the brain death concept, our data indicate specific areas for improvement in conceptual clarity, particularly among nurses and less experienced professionals. In contrast to personal/philosophical influences, clinical exposure increases understanding and alignment with definitions, underscoring the need for targeted interdisciplinary education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007220
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining ICU Staff’s Conceptions, Opinions, Views, Experiences, and Reflection (DISCOVER) of Brain Death—Results From a Swiss Multicenter Survey

Mathias Nebiker, Pascale Grzonka, Kai Tisljar, Luca Cioccari et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Determining ICU Staff’s Conceptions, Opinions, Views, Experiences, and Reflection (DISCOVER) of Brain Death—Results From a Swiss Multicenter Survey

Mathias Nebiker, Pascale Grzonka, Kai Tisljar, Luca Cioccari, Raoul Sutter, Urs Fisch, Regina Schumann, Sabina Hunziker, Sebastian Berger
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To assess perceptions, beliefs, and conceptual understanding of brain death among ICU professionals at three Swiss hospitals and to examine their associations with personal, educational, and professional experiences. Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. Setting: Multicenter survey at three Swiss care centers. Subjects: ICU healthcare professionals (i.e., physicians and nurses). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Questionnaires assessed demographics, religious beliefs, professional experience, exposure to brain death cases, knowledge of diagnostic criteria, and emotional and ethical attitudes using closed-ended and semi-open questions, Likert scales (1 = “very unsure,” “absolutely not” to 10 = “very sure,” “absolutely”), and checklists. Endpoints were (primary) perceptions, beliefs, conceptual understanding of brain death, and (secondary) interprofessional differences and associations/correlations with personal, educational, social, and professional factors. Among 338 ICU professionals (78.1% nurses, 74% women), key diagnostic brain death criteria were well recognized, although misconceptions about nonessential tests persisted. Self-perceived understanding and approval were high (both median Likert scores, 9; interquartile range [IQR], 8–10), while agreement that a brain-dead patient is not a patient but a corpse was much lower (median, 1; IQR, 1–4). Physicians showed greater approval than nurses ( p = 0.003) and were more likely to equate brain death with circulatory death ( p < 0.001). Understanding increased with ICU experience (ρ = 0.194) and age (ρ = 0.213; both p < 0.001) and was higher among those with prior exposure to brain death or its diagnostics (both p < 0.001). No significant associations were found for sex, religious beliefs, parenthood, or bereavement. Conclusions: Although Swiss ICU professionals generally endorse and understand the brain death concept, our data indicate specific areas for improvement in conceptual clarity, particularly among nurses and less experienced professionals. In contrast to personal/philosophical influences, clinical exposure increases understanding and alignment with definitions, underscoring the need for targeted interdisciplinary education.

Critical Care Medicine
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Kantonsspital Baselland (CH), Hospital Base (CL), Kantonsspital Aarau (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.