Contemporary Microbial Profile of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions

OBJECTIVE: There is a dearth of data for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) erosions after the introduction of InhibiZone-coated devices in 2008. We aim to identify common organisms associated with non-infected and infected AUS device erosions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively collected, institutionally approved quality improvement database of AUS implantations, removals, or revisions performed our facility. Devices implanted after 2008 that subsequently eroded were included for review. Erosion was confirmed cystoscopically in all cases. Urine cultures and intraoperative cultures (tissue, aspirate, or swab) were reviewed. Descriptive analyses of clinical and culture data were performed. RESULTS: (11%). Positive intraoperative cultures isolated more gram-negative organisms (47%) than gram-positive organisms (38%). CONCLUSION: InhibiZone-coated AUS devices erosions were associated with a wide variety of organisms, including gram-positive, gram-negative, and fungal species. This can help guide modern anti-microbial prophylaxis practices and empiric treatment pathways in the eroded patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urology Practice
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/upj.0000000000001035
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary Microbial Profile of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions

Mariela Martinez, Aaron Lentz, Ming-Yeah Hu, Kiran Sury et al.
Urology Practice
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

Contemporary Microbial Profile of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions

Mariela Martinez, Aaron Lentz, Ming-Yeah Hu, Kiran Sury, Brent Nose, Jordan R. Foreman, Thomas Schroeder, Andrew C. Peterson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a dearth of data for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) erosions after the introduction of InhibiZone-coated devices in 2008. We aim to identify common organisms associated with non-infected and infected AUS device erosions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively collected, institutionally approved quality improvement database of AUS implantations, removals, or revisions performed our facility. Devices implanted after 2008 that subsequently eroded were included for review. Erosion was confirmed cystoscopically in all cases. Urine cultures and intraoperative cultures (tissue, aspirate, or swab) were reviewed. Descriptive analyses of clinical and culture data were performed. RESULTS: (11%). Positive intraoperative cultures isolated more gram-negative organisms (47%) than gram-positive organisms (38%). CONCLUSION: InhibiZone-coated AUS devices erosions were associated with a wide variety of organisms, including gram-positive, gram-negative, and fungal species. This can help guide modern anti-microbial prophylaxis practices and empiric treatment pathways in the eroded patient.

Urology Practice
Allegheny Health Network (US), St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contemporary Microbial Profile of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions — Mariela Martinez, Aaron Lentz, et al. · Urology Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS