Institutionalizing revenge: state-constructed narratives in Azerbaijan’s policy toward Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh

Explanatory frameworks concerning Azerbaijan’s military assertiveness against Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh have primarily revolved around hard power-based realist propensities. Although useful, the boundaries and meaning of these interpretations downplay the importance of revenge as a conceptual, ideational, mobilizational, and strategic driver. Operationalization of the phenomenon of revenge can serve as an additional analytical framework in explaining Azerbaijan’s excessively coercive stance against Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh. Drawing on the theoretical framework developed by Löwenheim and Heimann, the paper examines the instrumental utility and limitations of the concept of revenge in explaining Azerbaijan’s institutional practices and strategic choices of retribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2026.2680151
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutionalizing revenge: state-constructed narratives in Azerbaijan’s policy toward Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh

Vahram Ter‐Matevosyan
Small Wars and Insurgencies
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

Institutionalizing revenge: state-constructed narratives in Azerbaijan’s policy toward Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh

Vahram Ter‐Matevosyan
article en

Abstract

Explanatory frameworks concerning Azerbaijan’s military assertiveness against Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh have primarily revolved around hard power-based realist propensities. Although useful, the boundaries and meaning of these interpretations downplay the importance of revenge as a conceptual, ideational, mobilizational, and strategic driver. Operationalization of the phenomenon of revenge can serve as an additional analytical framework in explaining Azerbaijan’s excessively coercive stance against Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh. Drawing on the theoretical framework developed by Löwenheim and Heimann, the paper examines the instrumental utility and limitations of the concept of revenge in explaining Azerbaijan’s institutional practices and strategic choices of retribution.

Small Wars and Insurgencies
American University of Armenia (AM)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutionalizing revenge: state-constructed narratives in Azerbaijan’s policy toward Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh — Vahram Ter‐Matevosyan · Small Wars and Insurgencies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS