The quality of meta-analyses in agricultural sustainability has been increasing, but weaknesses persist

Abstract Meta-analyses (MAs) are needed to inform agricultural policies on sustainable farming practices (FPs). This study assesses the quality against established criteria of 570 MAs published from 2000-2023 and included in the recently published “JRC-Farming Practices Evidence Library”. We find that average MA quality significantly improved ( p < 0.001) over time. However, about two-thirds of the assessments showed deficiencies in at least four areas, notably study selection and publication bias reporting. MAs related to animal husbandry, manure management, and those synthesizing modelling-derived outcomes demonstrated particularly low quality. Less than 40% of MAs provided accessible original data, limiting reproducibility and re-use. These shortcomings may hinder the full potential of MAs to support evidence-based policy. We propose recommendations to promote FAIR data sharing, enhance awareness, and encourage greater transparency in reporting, which a needed to strengthen the role of MAs in agricultural sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Sustainable Agriculture
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-026-00148-7
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The quality of meta-analyses in agricultural sustainability has been increasing, but weaknesses persist

Rui Catarino, Simona Bosco, Marta Pérez‐Soba, Beatrice Landoni et al.
npj Sustainable Agriculture
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

The quality of meta-analyses in agricultural sustainability has been increasing, but weaknesses persist

Rui Catarino, Simona Bosco, Marta Pérez‐Soba, Beatrice Landoni, Irene Guerrero, Marijn van der Velde, Ana Montero‐Castaño, Carlo Rega, Otho Mantegazza, Mathilde Chen, Andrea Schievano, María Bielza, Giovanni Tamburini, Jean‐Michel Terres, Maria Luisa Paracchini, Linda See, David Makowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Meta-analyses (MAs) are needed to inform agricultural policies on sustainable farming practices (FPs). This study assesses the quality against established criteria of 570 MAs published from 2000-2023 and included in the recently published “JRC-Farming Practices Evidence Library”. We find that average MA quality significantly improved ( p < 0.001) over time. However, about two-thirds of the assessments showed deficiencies in at least four areas, notably study selection and publication bias reporting. MAs related to animal husbandry, manure management, and those synthesizing modelling-derived outcomes demonstrated particularly low quality. Less than 40% of MAs provided accessible original data, limiting reproducibility and re-use. These shortcomings may hinder the full potential of MAs to support evidence-based policy. We propose recommendations to promote FAIR data sharing, enhance awareness, and encourage greater transparency in reporting, which a needed to strengthen the role of MAs in agricultural sustainability.

npj Sustainable AgricultureVol. 4(1)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (AT), University of Milan (IT), Université de Montpellier (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Joint Research Centre (IT), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Plant Health Institute de Montpellier (FR), L'Institut Agro (FR), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Joint Research Centre
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.