Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Stability Using Customized Plates in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Patient-specific implants (PSIs) in orthognathic surgery offer optimal intraoperative accuracy. However, evidence regarding their postoperative skeletal stability, specifically comparing distinct fixation designs and segmentation patterns, remains limited. We present a retrospective cohort study that evaluated 64 adult patients undergoing customized maxillary orthognathic surgery between January 2020 and June 2025. The primary predictor variables were fixation design (conventional customized plates vs. minimally invasive plates) and maxillary segmentation (monoblock vs. multisegmental). The outcome variable was 3D skeletal stability, measured as linear displacement between preoperative planning and 6-month postoperative imaging. Non-parametric tests compared displacements and clinical instability rates (defined as ≥2.0 mm). Mann–Whitney tests compared landmark displacements, Fisher’s exact tests compared proportions with ≥2.0 mm displacement, and ORs with 95% CIs were computed (α = 0.05). Analysis of 64 patients revealed that median displacement across landmarks ranged from 0.7 to 4.28 mm and 28.1% exhibited displacement ≥ 2.0 mm, primarily in molar and canine regions. While overall instability rates did not differ significantly between single-segment and multisegmental osteotomies (p = 0.28), multisegmental cases showed significantly higher displacement at the left canine (p = 0.027). Plate design was not associated with skeletal instability (p = 0.88), suggesting that minimally invasive plates provide comparable stability to conventional designs. Customized maxillary plates provide reliable postoperative stability with median displacements within clinically acceptable limits (<2 mm). Minimally invasive PSI designs offer stability comparable to conventional extended designs. However, localized instability in multisegmental cases suggests a need for careful biomechanical management regardless of the fixation method used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr19020027
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Stability Using Customized Plates in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Ximena Toledo, Alberto Führer, L. Aguilar, Juan Pablo Vargas Buratovic et al.
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Stability Using Customized Plates in Orthognathic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Ximena Toledo, Alberto Führer, L. Aguilar, Juan Pablo Vargas Buratovic, Felipe Merchan, Valentina Matamala Ibaceta
article en

Abstract

Patient-specific implants (PSIs) in orthognathic surgery offer optimal intraoperative accuracy. However, evidence regarding their postoperative skeletal stability, specifically comparing distinct fixation designs and segmentation patterns, remains limited. We present a retrospective cohort study that evaluated 64 adult patients undergoing customized maxillary orthognathic surgery between January 2020 and June 2025. The primary predictor variables were fixation design (conventional customized plates vs. minimally invasive plates) and maxillary segmentation (monoblock vs. multisegmental). The outcome variable was 3D skeletal stability, measured as linear displacement between preoperative planning and 6-month postoperative imaging. Non-parametric tests compared displacements and clinical instability rates (defined as ≥2.0 mm). Mann–Whitney tests compared landmark displacements, Fisher’s exact tests compared proportions with ≥2.0 mm displacement, and ORs with 95% CIs were computed (α = 0.05). Analysis of 64 patients revealed that median displacement across landmarks ranged from 0.7 to 4.28 mm and 28.1% exhibited displacement ≥ 2.0 mm, primarily in molar and canine regions. While overall instability rates did not differ significantly between single-segment and multisegmental osteotomies (p = 0.28), multisegmental cases showed significantly higher displacement at the left canine (p = 0.027). Plate design was not associated with skeletal instability (p = 0.88), suggesting that minimally invasive plates provide comparable stability to conventional designs. Customized maxillary plates provide reliable postoperative stability with median displacements within clinically acceptable limits (<2 mm). Minimally invasive PSI designs offer stability comparable to conventional extended designs. However, localized instability in multisegmental cases suggests a need for careful biomechanical management regardless of the fixation method used.

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & ReconstructionVol. 19(2)
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Universidad de Los Andes, Chile (CL), Instituto Profesional Providencia (CL), Complejo Asistencial Sótero del Río (CL), University of Chile (CL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.