How Are Educational Technologies Evaluated for Elementary Students’ Math and Literacy Learning: A Systematic Review

The use of educational technology (EdTech) has grown rapidly, yet there remains a lack of synthesized evidence on how EdTech tools are evaluated for math and literacy learning. This study conducted a systematic review of how EdTech has been evaluated in K-8 education, based on 44 peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024. It explored key dimensions, including study methodology (e.g., design), technological features (e.g., device types), evaluation aspects (e.g., user experience), assessment tools (e.g., surveys), and math and literacy learning outcomes (e.g., counting, vocabulary). The analysis showed that majority of the studies employed quasi-experimental designs (57%), pre-posttest designs (66%), and featured medium sample sizes (55%). Twelve distinct EdTech platforms were identified, with educational games most common in math and web-based applications in literacy. Tablets and iPads were the most frequently used devices, and feedback was the most frequent educational feature. Performance assessments, particularly pre-posttests, were used in most studies (86%), and nearly half relied on platform-generated data (41%). Outcome measures focused largely on basic math skills and reading comprehension, with limited focus on integrated math and literacy learning outcomes. These findings provide a structured lens for evaluating EdTech in elementary education, therefore, guiding the creation of more comprehensive and effective methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Childhood Education
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2026.2657313
Primary Topic
Education and Technology Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Are Educational Technologies Evaluated for Elementary Students’ Math and Literacy Learning: A Systematic Review

Sabrina Shajeen Alam, Daniel Ansari
Journal of Research in Childhood Education
Education and Technology Integration
article

How Are Educational Technologies Evaluated for Elementary Students’ Math and Literacy Learning: A Systematic Review

Sabrina Shajeen Alam, Daniel Ansari
article en

Abstract

The use of educational technology (EdTech) has grown rapidly, yet there remains a lack of synthesized evidence on how EdTech tools are evaluated for math and literacy learning. This study conducted a systematic review of how EdTech has been evaluated in K-8 education, based on 44 peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2024. It explored key dimensions, including study methodology (e.g., design), technological features (e.g., device types), evaluation aspects (e.g., user experience), assessment tools (e.g., surveys), and math and literacy learning outcomes (e.g., counting, vocabulary). The analysis showed that majority of the studies employed quasi-experimental designs (57%), pre-posttest designs (66%), and featured medium sample sizes (55%). Twelve distinct EdTech platforms were identified, with educational games most common in math and web-based applications in literacy. Tablets and iPads were the most frequently used devices, and feedback was the most frequent educational feature. Performance assessments, particularly pre-posttests, were used in most studies (86%), and nearly half relied on platform-generated data (41%). Outcome measures focused largely on basic math skills and reading comprehension, with limited focus on integrated math and literacy learning outcomes. These findings provide a structured lens for evaluating EdTech in elementary education, therefore, guiding the creation of more comprehensive and effective methods.

Journal of Research in Childhood Education
Western University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Technology Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.