Influence of Cardiac Motion on Stent Lumen Visibility in Photon-Counting CT Employing a Pulsatile Heart Model

Introduction: Detection of in-stent restenosis by cardiac CT is challenging due to blooming artifacts. The technological progress of CT scanners and especially the recent introduction of photon-counting detectors (PCDs) has led to an improvement in image quality. Several studies have analyzed the lumen visibility of coronary stents, but most studies used models which did not simulate cardiac movement. In this study we use a pulsatile heart model to simulate a heartbeat to analyze the effects of cardiac motion on image quality. Methods: Seventeen different coronary stents with an outer diameter of 3.0 mm were implanted into polyolefin tubes. The tubes were then filled with diluted contrast medium and attached to the pulsatile heart model. The stents were scanned in a third-generation dual-source CT with an energy-integrating detector (EID) and a first-generation PCD CT. Results: In motion, the mean visible stent lumen was reduced from 64.4% to 59.4% in EID CT, from 61.4% to 56.0% in PCD CT using the Bv60 kernel, and from 72.9% to 62.9% in PCD CT using the Bv72 kernel, each in standard resolution mode. Employing the ultra-high-resolution mode (UHR), stent lumen visibility was reduced from 61.3% to 57.9% with the Bv60 kernel and from 71.7% to 61.8% with the Bv72 kernel. The difference between static imaging and motion was significant in each instance (p < 0.001). Conclusions: While PCD CT and the use of sharper kernels improves the image quality in comparison with EID CT and smoother kernels, the impact of cardiac motion on the reduction in stent lumen visibility is substantial. Hence, the best image quality is achieved in patients with a normal and regular heart rate. If this is not possible to achieve, a retrospective acquisition mode should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16121775
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Cardiac Motion on Stent Lumen Visibility in Photon-Counting CT Employing a Pulsatile Heart Model

Henner Huflage, Bernhard Petritsch, Christoph Panknin, Nils Petri et al.
Diagnostics
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
article

Influence of Cardiac Motion on Stent Lumen Visibility in Photon-Counting CT Employing a Pulsatile Heart Model

Henner Huflage, Bernhard Petritsch, Christoph Panknin, Nils Petri, Martin Petersilka, Jan‐Peter Grunz, Thorsten Alexander Bley, Julius F. Heidenreich
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Detection of in-stent restenosis by cardiac CT is challenging due to blooming artifacts. The technological progress of CT scanners and especially the recent introduction of photon-counting detectors (PCDs) has led to an improvement in image quality. Several studies have analyzed the lumen visibility of coronary stents, but most studies used models which did not simulate cardiac movement. In this study we use a pulsatile heart model to simulate a heartbeat to analyze the effects of cardiac motion on image quality. Methods: Seventeen different coronary stents with an outer diameter of 3.0 mm were implanted into polyolefin tubes. The tubes were then filled with diluted contrast medium and attached to the pulsatile heart model. The stents were scanned in a third-generation dual-source CT with an energy-integrating detector (EID) and a first-generation PCD CT. Results: In motion, the mean visible stent lumen was reduced from 64.4% to 59.4% in EID CT, from 61.4% to 56.0% in PCD CT using the Bv60 kernel, and from 72.9% to 62.9% in PCD CT using the Bv72 kernel, each in standard resolution mode. Employing the ultra-high-resolution mode (UHR), stent lumen visibility was reduced from 61.3% to 57.9% with the Bv60 kernel and from 71.7% to 61.8% with the Bv72 kernel. The difference between static imaging and motion was significant in each instance (p < 0.001). Conclusions: While PCD CT and the use of sharper kernels improves the image quality in comparison with EID CT and smoother kernels, the impact of cardiac motion on the reduction in stent lumen visibility is substantial. Hence, the best image quality is achieved in patients with a normal and regular heart rate. If this is not possible to achieve, a retrospective acquisition mode should be considered.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(12)
Siemens (Germany) (DE), Klinikum Klagenfurt (AT), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US), Siemens Healthineers (Germany) (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.