Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (SPAIN Trial): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), particularly through a robotic approach (RPD), is gaining increasing worldwide acceptance. However, high-quality evidence remains limited and very few randomized controlled trials have directly compared RPD with open PD (OPD). The SPAIN Trial (Spanish Pancreatoduodenectomy: Open vs. Robotic Approach) is designed to generate national evidence on the safety, efficacy, and economic value of RPD compared with the open technique. This is a national, multicentre, randomized, prospective, non-inferiority trial comparing RPD and OPD in high-volume Spanish centres with established robotic pancreatic programs. Adult patients indicated for elective PD due to benign or malignant disease of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, or ampulla of Vater will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (2RPD:1OPD). The primary endpoint is overall postoperative morbidity within 90 days, assessed by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Secondary endpoints include intraoperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, conversion rate), ISGPS-defined pancreatic complications, oncological outcomes (R0 resection, lymph node yield, time to adjuvant therapy), length of stay, readmission rates, and patient-reported quality of life using EQ-5D-5 L, EORTC QLQ-C30, and PAN-26 questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) from a healthcare perspective.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06981273.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Updates in Surgery
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02574-1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (SPAIN Trial): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness

Elizabeth Pando, Nair Fernandes, María Alejandra Guerrero-Ortiz, Alberto García Picazo et al.
Updates in Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (SPAIN Trial): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness

Elizabeth Pando, Nair Fernandes, María Alejandra Guerrero-Ortiz, Alberto García Picazo, Robert Memba, Alfredo Escartín, Danilo Vinci, F.J. Tejero-Pintor, Valentina Ferri, Patricia Sanchez-Velázquez, Emilio Vicente, SPAIN Trial group, Constantino Fondevila, Alberto Carrancho, Benedetto Ielpo, Victor Molina, Candido Alcazar, Marta Gimeno-Lopez, Amelia J. Hessheimer, Fulthon-Frank Vela, Rosa Maria Jorba, Jose Manuel Ramia, Fernando Burdio, Santiago Sanchez-Cabus, Riccardo Caruso, David Pacheco
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), particularly through a robotic approach (RPD), is gaining increasing worldwide acceptance. However, high-quality evidence remains limited and very few randomized controlled trials have directly compared RPD with open PD (OPD). The SPAIN Trial (Spanish Pancreatoduodenectomy: Open vs. Robotic Approach) is designed to generate national evidence on the safety, efficacy, and economic value of RPD compared with the open technique. This is a national, multicentre, randomized, prospective, non-inferiority trial comparing RPD and OPD in high-volume Spanish centres with established robotic pancreatic programs. Adult patients indicated for elective PD due to benign or malignant disease of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, or ampulla of Vater will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (2RPD:1OPD). The primary endpoint is overall postoperative morbidity within 90 days, assessed by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Secondary endpoints include intraoperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, conversion rate), ISGPS-defined pancreatic complications, oncological outcomes (R0 resection, lymph node yield, time to adjuvant therapy), length of stay, readmission rates, and patient-reported quality of life using EQ-5D-5 L, EORTC QLQ-C30, and PAN-26 questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) from a healthcare perspective.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06981273.

Updates in Surgery
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.