Delineation of Ecological Management Zones from an Ecological Resilience Perspective: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province

Understanding regional ecological resilience is important for mitigating ecological risks, safeguarding ecological security, and optimizing territorial spatial planning. From the perspective of ecological resilience, this study constructed an ecological management zoning framework based on three dimensions: “resistance–adaptability–recovery”. This framework was used to comprehensively interpret the ecological characteristics of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province and to further develop ecological management zoning. The main results are as follows: (1) The five ecosystem services remained generally stable during the study period. CS and WR increased slightly, whereas HQ, CY, and SC declined. High-value areas were mainly concentrated in mountainous regions such as the Lüliang, Taiyue, and Zhongtiao Mountains, while low-value areas were mainly distributed in the central basins. The OWA-based multi-scenario simulation showed that Scenario 3 achieved a better balance between representing the spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and maintaining a balanced weight allocation among services. (2) Landscape indices showed no obvious fluctuations during the study period. SHDI increased slightly, COHESION remained consistently high, and PD changed only marginally. (3) Ecological recovery exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity. Low-recovery areas were mainly concentrated in the Taiyuan and Yuncheng Basins, while relatively high-recovery areas were mainly distributed in the northern Lüliang Mountains and along parts of the Qinhe River. The mean ecological recovery decreased from 0.254 in 2010 to 0.242 in 2015 and further to 0.237 in 2020. (4) Based on the integrated analysis of ecological resistance, ecological adaptability, and ecological recovery, the study area was divided into three ecological management zones: Ecological Restoration Zones, Development Trade-off Zones, and Comprehensive Regulation Zones. Differentiated ecological governance strategies were then proposed for each zone. Overall, this study developed a multidimensional ecological management zoning framework from the perspective of ecological resilience, which can improve the targeting and adaptability of regional ecological governance and provide scientific support for ecological protection, spatial optimization, and coordinated sustainable governance in the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061017
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delineation of Ecological Management Zones from an Ecological Resilience Perspective: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province

Wenhui Fu, Yanbing Qi, Xiangyun Yang, Kaixuan Qian et al.
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Delineation of Ecological Management Zones from an Ecological Resilience Perspective: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province

Wenhui Fu, Yanbing Qi, Xiangyun Yang, Kaixuan Qian, X.C. Li, Han Sun
article en

Abstract

Understanding regional ecological resilience is important for mitigating ecological risks, safeguarding ecological security, and optimizing territorial spatial planning. From the perspective of ecological resilience, this study constructed an ecological management zoning framework based on three dimensions: “resistance–adaptability–recovery”. This framework was used to comprehensively interpret the ecological characteristics of the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province and to further develop ecological management zoning. The main results are as follows: (1) The five ecosystem services remained generally stable during the study period. CS and WR increased slightly, whereas HQ, CY, and SC declined. High-value areas were mainly concentrated in mountainous regions such as the Lüliang, Taiyue, and Zhongtiao Mountains, while low-value areas were mainly distributed in the central basins. The OWA-based multi-scenario simulation showed that Scenario 3 achieved a better balance between representing the spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and maintaining a balanced weight allocation among services. (2) Landscape indices showed no obvious fluctuations during the study period. SHDI increased slightly, COHESION remained consistently high, and PD changed only marginally. (3) Ecological recovery exhibited significant spatial heterogeneity. Low-recovery areas were mainly concentrated in the Taiyuan and Yuncheng Basins, while relatively high-recovery areas were mainly distributed in the northern Lüliang Mountains and along parts of the Qinhe River. The mean ecological recovery decreased from 0.254 in 2010 to 0.242 in 2015 and further to 0.237 in 2020. (4) Based on the integrated analysis of ecological resistance, ecological adaptability, and ecological recovery, the study area was divided into three ecological management zones: Ecological Restoration Zones, Development Trade-off Zones, and Comprehensive Regulation Zones. Differentiated ecological governance strategies were then proposed for each zone. Overall, this study developed a multidimensional ecological management zoning framework from the perspective of ecological resilience, which can improve the targeting and adaptability of regional ecological governance and provide scientific support for ecological protection, spatial optimization, and coordinated sustainable governance in the Yellow River Basin in Shanxi Province.

LandVol. 15(6)
Northwest A&F University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.