Testing Experimental Theories: A Bayesian Analysis of Robert Millikan’s Measurements of the Fundamental Electric Charge

Abstract In the early 20th century a controversy arose between Robert Millikan and Felix Ehrenhaft regarding the fundamental electric charge. This controversy began among physicists in the 1910s and has continued among historians and sociologists of science, with doubts persisting that Millikan had confirmed his finding of a unitary charge. While some have argued that the matter was resolved by Millikan’s experiments, others maintain that the claim remains unresolved due to theoretical bias. A method is described to quantitatively compute the probability of the respective theories in Bayesian terms, both in real time, as observations are made, and cumulatively after a batch of experimental measurements were completed. Millikan’s experimental results are modelled as a matrix of theory-experiment co-occurrences and show that Millikan’s findings were conclusive. The applicability of the method to the history of science is discussed. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/QSS.a.494

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantitative Science Studies
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss.a.494
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing Experimental Theories: A Bayesian Analysis of Robert Millikan’s Measurements of the Fundamental Electric Charge

Henry Small
Quantitative Science Studies
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Testing Experimental Theories: A Bayesian Analysis of Robert Millikan’s Measurements of the Fundamental Electric Charge

Henry Small
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the early 20th century a controversy arose between Robert Millikan and Felix Ehrenhaft regarding the fundamental electric charge. This controversy began among physicists in the 1910s and has continued among historians and sociologists of science, with doubts persisting that Millikan had confirmed his finding of a unitary charge. While some have argued that the matter was resolved by Millikan’s experiments, others maintain that the claim remains unresolved due to theoretical bias. A method is described to quantitatively compute the probability of the respective theories in Bayesian terms, both in real time, as observations are made, and cumulatively after a batch of experimental measurements were completed. Millikan’s experimental results are modelled as a matrix of theory-experiment co-occurrences and show that Millikan’s findings were conclusive. The applicability of the method to the history of science is discussed. Peer Review https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/QSS.a.494

Quantitative Science Studies
SciTech Strategies (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.