Evaluating the educational effectiveness of team-based cadaveric dissection in undergraduate anatomy training

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric dissection remains central to undergraduate anatomy education, yet its effectiveness is increasingly constrained by limited cadaver availability, inadequate laboratory infrastructure, and the emotional burden experienced by students. These challenges highlight the need for pedagogical approaches that optimise learning while maximising scarce anatomical resources. This study evaluated the educational effectiveness of a team-based learning (TBL) approach to cadaveric dissection among undergraduate anatomy students at Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was employed involving 155 second-year anatomy students assigned to either a traditional learning (TL) group (n = 77) or a TBL group (n = 78). Academic performance was assessed using standardised examination scores. Students' perceptions of collaboration, motivation, critical thinking, emotional adaptation, and resource utilisation were collected using structured questionnaires. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and independent-samples t-tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Students in the TBL group achieved significantly higher mean examination scores (84.6 ± 6.8) than those in the TL group (74.2 ± 7.5; t = 8.12, p < 0.001). A greater proportion of TBL participants reported enhanced collaboration (88% vs. 52%), increased motivation (90% vs. 60%), and improved emotional adjustment to dissection activities (82% vs. 48%). Additionally, 85% of TBL students indicated that task distribution within teams improved cadaver utilisation, compared with 38% in the TL group. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based cadaveric dissection produced superior cognitive and affective learning outcomes compared with traditional instruction. By improving academic performance, fostering teamwork, reducing emotional stress, and enhancing the efficient use of limited cadaveric resources, TBL represents a practical and effective pedagogical model for anatomy education in resource-constrained settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09491-2
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the educational effectiveness of team-based cadaveric dissection in undergraduate anatomy training

Willy B. Vidona, Ikenna Theophilus Ikele, Helen Kikelomo Akinsunmi
BMC Medical Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Evaluating the educational effectiveness of team-based cadaveric dissection in undergraduate anatomy training

Willy B. Vidona, Ikenna Theophilus Ikele, Helen Kikelomo Akinsunmi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric dissection remains central to undergraduate anatomy education, yet its effectiveness is increasingly constrained by limited cadaver availability, inadequate laboratory infrastructure, and the emotional burden experienced by students. These challenges highlight the need for pedagogical approaches that optimise learning while maximising scarce anatomical resources. This study evaluated the educational effectiveness of a team-based learning (TBL) approach to cadaveric dissection among undergraduate anatomy students at Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria. METHODS: A quasi-experimental design was employed involving 155 second-year anatomy students assigned to either a traditional learning (TL) group (n = 77) or a TBL group (n = 78). Academic performance was assessed using standardised examination scores. Students' perceptions of collaboration, motivation, critical thinking, emotional adaptation, and resource utilisation were collected using structured questionnaires. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and independent-samples t-tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Students in the TBL group achieved significantly higher mean examination scores (84.6 ± 6.8) than those in the TL group (74.2 ± 7.5; t = 8.12, p < 0.001). A greater proportion of TBL participants reported enhanced collaboration (88% vs. 52%), increased motivation (90% vs. 60%), and improved emotional adjustment to dissection activities (82% vs. 48%). Additionally, 85% of TBL students indicated that task distribution within teams improved cadaver utilisation, compared with 38% in the TL group. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based cadaveric dissection produced superior cognitive and affective learning outcomes compared with traditional instruction. By improving academic performance, fostering teamwork, reducing emotional stress, and enhancing the efficient use of limited cadaveric resources, TBL represents a practical and effective pedagogical model for anatomy education in resource-constrained settings.

BMC Medical Education
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Ambrose Alli University (NG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.