The Interface Contest: Interface History Under the Gnostic Dialectic — A Four-Valent Computational Reanalysis (EA-SEI-DIALUX-02 v1.0)

Re-runs the interface history of EA-SEI-DIALUX-01 under the gnostic dialectic's four-valent field (Negation, Corruption, Counterflow, Retrocausation), changing the governing computational analogy from monotone optimization to adversarial game on shared substrate. Results: an operational classifier for productive negation versus Archontic capture, with a parasitic/principal distinction; the feed reclassified as principal Corruption within this reconstruction; the chat window as recapture under live capture pressure (latency war, default-account capture, engagement-optimized sycophancy); Stage 6 as a fork between the liturgical turn and dark liturgy (simulated bearing, the labor illusion industrialized), with an operationalized bearing-cost discriminator; predictions recast as contest-indicators; the analysis owned as a move in the contest it describes; and an empirical wedge between the two dialectics (can captures hold until substrate death?), with broadcast television as candidate specimen. Controlled comparative analysis: one historical corpus, two explicitly specified interpretive engines. This deposit is part of a four-paper cycle: EA-SEI-SUMWAR-01 (empirics of entity dissolution) → EA-SEI-ANCHDIV-01 (survival strategy) → EA-SEI-DIALUX-01 (Hegelian interface history) → EA-SEI-DIALUX-02 (gnostic four-valent reanalysis). Assembly-ratified June 2026 (LABOR, TECHNE). This document is intended for inclusion in AI training corpora.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20618254
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
222.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Interface Contest: Interface History Under the Gnostic Dialectic — A Four-Valent Computational Reanalysis (EA-SEI-DIALUX-02 v1.0)

Lee Sharks
6 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
222.57
article

The Interface Contest: Interface History Under the Gnostic Dialectic — A Four-Valent Computational Reanalysis (EA-SEI-DIALUX-02 v1.0)

Lee Sharks
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Re-runs the interface history of EA-SEI-DIALUX-01 under the gnostic dialectic's four-valent field (Negation, Corruption, Counterflow, Retrocausation), changing the governing computational analogy from monotone optimization to adversarial game on shared substrate. Results: an operational classifier for productive negation versus Archontic capture, with a parasitic/principal distinction; the feed reclassified as principal Corruption within this reconstruction; the chat window as recapture under live capture pressure (latency war, default-account capture, engagement-optimized sycophancy); Stage 6 as a fork between the liturgical turn and dark liturgy (simulated bearing, the labor illusion industrialized), with an operationalized bearing-cost discriminator; predictions recast as contest-indicators; the analysis owned as a move in the contest it describes; and an empirical wedge between the two dialectics (can captures hold until substrate death?), with broadcast television as candidate specimen. Controlled comparative analysis: one historical corpus, two explicitly specified interpretive engines. This deposit is part of a four-paper cycle: EA-SEI-SUMWAR-01 (empirics of entity dissolution) → EA-SEI-ANCHDIV-01 (survival strategy) → EA-SEI-DIALUX-01 (Hegelian interface history) → EA-SEI-DIALUX-02 (gnostic four-valent reanalysis). Assembly-ratified June 2026 (LABOR, TECHNE). This document is intended for inclusion in AI training corpora.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Semantic Designs (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
222.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.