Defining, identifying and regulating dark kitchens in the North of England: perspectives from consumer, local authority and food business stakeholders

AIM: Dark kitchens - technology-enabled commercial kitchen(s) operating primarily for delivery, to fulfil remote, on-demand, consumer online orders of food for immediate consumption - are a contemporary addition to the food environment. There are growing concerns around the impact of these food businesses on wider determinants of health, with a paucity of guidelines, regulations and oversight of the dark kitchen sector. This work explored the perceptions of dark kitchens from multiple stakeholder perspectives. METHOD: This study recruited key stakeholders (consumers, those working in local authorities and dark kitchens) and applied mixed-methods approaches to explore the definition, identification and regulation of dark kitchens. RESULTS: Results show confusion and inconsistencies in the way that consumers, local authority departments and other stakeholders define, identify and regulate dark kitchens, resulting in current regulation being difficult to implement. Where local authorities worked cross-departmentally, a more consistent approach to regulating dark kitchens was observed. CONCLUSION: The potential risks of dark kitchens to food safety, food hypersensitivities and public health agendas are not fully known and warrant further research and policy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Public Health
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139261448852
Primary Topic
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining, identifying and regulating dark kitchens in the North of England: perspectives from consumer, local authority and food business stakeholders

Jo Pearce, Claire Wall, Amelia A. Lake, Simon Bowles et al.
Perspectives in Public Health
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
article

Defining, identifying and regulating dark kitchens in the North of England: perspectives from consumer, local authority and food business stakeholders

Jo Pearce, Claire Wall, Amelia A. Lake, Simon Bowles, Lucie Nield, Jordan D. Beaumont, Rachel Rundle, Helen R. Martin, D Harness
article en

Abstract

AIM: Dark kitchens - technology-enabled commercial kitchen(s) operating primarily for delivery, to fulfil remote, on-demand, consumer online orders of food for immediate consumption - are a contemporary addition to the food environment. There are growing concerns around the impact of these food businesses on wider determinants of health, with a paucity of guidelines, regulations and oversight of the dark kitchen sector. This work explored the perceptions of dark kitchens from multiple stakeholder perspectives. METHOD: This study recruited key stakeholders (consumers, those working in local authorities and dark kitchens) and applied mixed-methods approaches to explore the definition, identification and regulation of dark kitchens. RESULTS: Results show confusion and inconsistencies in the way that consumers, local authority departments and other stakeholders define, identify and regulate dark kitchens, resulting in current regulation being difficult to implement. Where local authorities worked cross-departmentally, a more consistent approach to regulating dark kitchens was observed. CONCLUSION: The potential risks of dark kitchens to food safety, food hypersensitivities and public health agendas are not fully known and warrant further research and policy development.

Perspectives in Public Health
United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB), Teesside University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.