Feeding and Fighting: Networks of Care and Reform in Relation to Armed Resistance in the Northwestern Frontier, 1831-1932.

This paper explores the relationship between practices of care, religious reform, and armed mobilization against the British colonial administration by a Qadiri <em>tariqat </em>in what is largely present day Khyber Pakhtunkwa. The first chapter describes the nature of religious reform and spiritual education as enacted through the Qadiri-Ghufuriyya network, explaining how religious schools and soup kitchens (<em>langar</em>)&nbsp;produced religious authority and opposed coloniality. The second chapter shows that the participation of Qadiri-Ghufuriyya <em>pirs</em> in armed mobilizations against colonizers was driven by the&nbsp;<em>pirs&nbsp;</em>themselves and a need to defend their religious institutions. These conclusions raise fascinating questions for an alleged state building project pursued by the order. For example, does a monopoly on social services and educational legitimacy within a prescribed territory constitute a state? An Islamic one?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/0t90-0504
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeding and Fighting: Networks of Care and Reform in Relation to Armed Resistance in the Northwestern Frontier, 1831-1932.

Liam Cuppett
UNC Libraries
Islamic Studies and History
article

Feeding and Fighting: Networks of Care and Reform in Relation to Armed Resistance in the Northwestern Frontier, 1831-1932.

Liam Cuppett
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between practices of care, religious reform, and armed mobilization against the British colonial administration by a Qadiri <em>tariqat </em>in what is largely present day Khyber Pakhtunkwa. The first chapter describes the nature of religious reform and spiritual education as enacted through the Qadiri-Ghufuriyya network, explaining how religious schools and soup kitchens (<em>langar</em>)&nbsp;produced religious authority and opposed coloniality. The second chapter shows that the participation of Qadiri-Ghufuriyya <em>pirs</em> in armed mobilizations against colonizers was driven by the&nbsp;<em>pirs&nbsp;</em>themselves and a need to defend their religious institutions. These conclusions raise fascinating questions for an alleged state building project pursued by the order. For example, does a monopoly on social services and educational legitimacy within a prescribed territory constitute a state? An Islamic one?

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feeding and Fighting: Networks of Care and Reform in Relation to Armed Resistance in the Northwestern Frontier, 1831-1932. — Liam Cuppett · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS