The psychological basis of the urban–rural divide: Evidence from Germany

Over the past decade, scholarly attention to the political relevance of “place” has increased, especially regarding the far right and in the contexts of Europe and the United States. Within the field, the urban-rural divide is of particular interest. While rural areas often display more right-leaning attitudes than urban ones, it remains uncertain whether these differences constitute a full-fledged cleavage, as this would require not just socio-structural conflict and political mobilisation but also a collective identity. Using Germany as a case study, this article investigates the psychological underpinnings of the urban–rural divide and its intersection with the division between the eastern and the western regions of Germany. The findings reveal a strong asymmetry: rural residents express stronger place-based identification and perceive greater conflict than urban citizens. In addition, we find that exclusively eastern identities are more prevalent than exclusively western ones, and that the urban–rural and the East–West cleavages operate independently. These results underscore the importance of analysing multiple geographic cleavages jointly and contribute new insights into the emotional and perceptual foundations of spatial divides in Germany.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electoral Studies
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2026.103103
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The psychological basis of the urban–rural divide: Evidence from Germany

Kai Arzheimer, Antonia Lang
Electoral Studies
Rural development and sustainability
article

The psychological basis of the urban–rural divide: Evidence from Germany

Kai Arzheimer, Antonia Lang
article en

Abstract

Over the past decade, scholarly attention to the political relevance of “place” has increased, especially regarding the far right and in the contexts of Europe and the United States. Within the field, the urban-rural divide is of particular interest. While rural areas often display more right-leaning attitudes than urban ones, it remains uncertain whether these differences constitute a full-fledged cleavage, as this would require not just socio-structural conflict and political mobilisation but also a collective identity. Using Germany as a case study, this article investigates the psychological underpinnings of the urban–rural divide and its intersection with the division between the eastern and the western regions of Germany. The findings reveal a strong asymmetry: rural residents express stronger place-based identification and perceive greater conflict than urban citizens. In addition, we find that exclusively eastern identities are more prevalent than exclusively western ones, and that the urban–rural and the East–West cleavages operate independently. These results underscore the importance of analysing multiple geographic cleavages jointly and contribute new insights into the emotional and perceptual foundations of spatial divides in Germany.

Electoral StudiesVol. 102
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The psychological basis of the urban–rural divide: Evidence from Germany — Kai Arzheimer, Antonia Lang · Electoral Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS