Factors associated with clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Objectives This study aimed to investigate the current level of clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses and identify its associated factors.Methods A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among 411 cardiovascular nurses from three tertiary hospitals in China between January and June 2025. Data were collected using the Clinical Leadership Scale, Nursing Work Environment Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis.Results The mean total score of clinical leadership was 63.53 ± 9.81 (mean item score 4.24 ± 0.82), indicating an above-average level. Higher scores were found in motivating others and role modelling, whereas challenging the status quo was the lowest-performing dimension. Professional title, working department, clinical leadership training, nursing work environment and general self-efficacy were independent positive influencing factors (all p < 0.05). Nursing work environment and general self-efficacy were strongly and positively correlated with clinical leadership (r = 0.738, 0.584; both p < 0.01).Conclusions Clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses is relatively high and is affected by both organisational and individual psychological factors. Targeted leadership training, improved nursing work environment and enhanced self-efficacy can effectively strengthen clinical leadership in cardiovascular nursing practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medicine
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2678681
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

L S Wang, Yuehua Chen, Leilei Wu, Haiyan Yu et al.
Annals of Medicine
Nursing education and management
article

Factors associated with clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

L S Wang, Yuehua Chen, Leilei Wu, Haiyan Yu, Xianfeng Wu
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to investigate the current level of clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses and identify its associated factors.Methods A multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among 411 cardiovascular nurses from three tertiary hospitals in China between January and June 2025. Data were collected using the Clinical Leadership Scale, Nursing Work Environment Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis.Results The mean total score of clinical leadership was 63.53 ± 9.81 (mean item score 4.24 ± 0.82), indicating an above-average level. Higher scores were found in motivating others and role modelling, whereas challenging the status quo was the lowest-performing dimension. Professional title, working department, clinical leadership training, nursing work environment and general self-efficacy were independent positive influencing factors (all p < 0.05). Nursing work environment and general self-efficacy were strongly and positively correlated with clinical leadership (r = 0.738, 0.584; both p < 0.01).Conclusions Clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses is relatively high and is affected by both organisational and individual psychological factors. Targeted leadership training, improved nursing work environment and enhanced self-efficacy can effectively strengthen clinical leadership in cardiovascular nursing practice.

Annals of MedicineVol. 58(1)
First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Xiamen Chang Gung Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.