Sinus rhythm duration after direct current cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation and long-term outcomes after subsequent catheter ablation
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) experience high rates of AF recurrence. Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is often performed prior to CA, with variable post-DCCV duration of sinus rhythm (SR). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether shorter SR duration after DCCV is associated with AF recurrence after subsequent CA. METHODS: We performed an international multicentre retrospective study of patients undergoing first-time CA for PsAF between 2015 and 2024 with a prior DCCV. SR duration after the last DCCV preceding CA was recorded. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia after CA (after a 56-day postablation blanking period). RESULTS: 938 patients undergoing first-time CA for PsAF were identified from six centres and categorised by post-DCCV SR duration: <7 days (group 1, n=212); 7-31 days (group 2, n=236); and >31 days (group 3, n=490). Over median post-CA follow-up of 511 days, 512 patients (55%) experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrence. There was no significant between-group difference in freedom from atrial arrhythmia (log-rank p=0.10). When analysed as a continuous variable in a Cox regression model, there was no association between post-DCCV SR duration and time to first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (HR per 10-day increment 1.00, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01, p=0.07). In secondary analyses, there were significantly more blanking period arrhythmias in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 (both pairwise p<0.001), and presentation for CA in persistent atrial arrhythmia was associated with a time-dependent increased risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence compared with presentation in SR. CONCLUSION: In this large multicentre cohort, shorter duration of SR after DCCV was associated with blanking period arrhythmia after subsequent CA, but we did not find evidence of an association with long-term AF recurrence. Clinicians should consider these findings when making decisions regarding suitability for CA or predicting long-term CA success.
Authors
- Senthil Kirubakaran
- Nikhil Ahluwalia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1257-5576)
- R I Griffiths
- Ken Ali
- Haseeb Valli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0786-8869)
- Sacchin Arockiam
- Rangeena Assadi
- Milena Leo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6991-6664)
- Timothy R. Betts (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-9905)
- Pok‐Tin Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-2743)
- Holden Eaton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9779-1017)
- Giampaolo Vetta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-0492)
- Matthew Ginks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-4532)
- Jonathan Hampshire (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6135-7746)
- Rohan S. Wijesurendra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8261-8343)
- Alexandre Almorad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-1661)
- Kate Eastwick-Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4162-201X)
- Yaver Bashir
- Ben Mercer
- Shouvik Haldar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8129-8520)
- Kim Rajappan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8996-2983)
- Jia H Chan
- Michala Pedersen
- Matthew Aldred
- Amanda Hurst
- Ross J Hunter
- Calum A Robertson
Institutions
- Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
- St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Queen Alexandra Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (BE)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Heart
- Published
- 2026-06-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327359
- Primary Topic
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- British Heart Foundation