The Earth, the Corporation, and the Unfinished Remedy: Human Rights, Environmental Harm, and the Limits of English Law

The relationship between corporate conduct, environmental harm, and human rights is one of the most pressing yet legally underdeveloped areas of English company law. As communities across the world—and increasingly in this jurisdiction—suffer the consequences of corporate environmental damage, a fundamental question arises: does English law provide an adequate civil remedy for those whose human rights are violated by corporate environmental misconduct? While English tort law provides some avenues for redress, the absence of a general civil cause of action directly grounded in human rights violations arising from environmental harm represents a lacuna that places the United Kingdom increasingly out of step with the direction of travel in comparable jurisdictions, where courts and legislatures have shown a greater willingness to recognise corporate obligations framed through the language of human rights and environmental responsibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.130900
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Earth, the Corporation, and the Unfinished Remedy: Human Rights, Environmental Harm, and the Limits of English Law

Ben Chester Cheong
Apollo
Environmental law and policy
article

The Earth, the Corporation, and the Unfinished Remedy: Human Rights, Environmental Harm, and the Limits of English Law

Ben Chester Cheong
article en

Abstract

The relationship between corporate conduct, environmental harm, and human rights is one of the most pressing yet legally underdeveloped areas of English company law. As communities across the world—and increasingly in this jurisdiction—suffer the consequences of corporate environmental damage, a fundamental question arises: does English law provide an adequate civil remedy for those whose human rights are violated by corporate environmental misconduct? While English tort law provides some avenues for redress, the absence of a general civil cause of action directly grounded in human rights violations arising from environmental harm represents a lacuna that places the United Kingdom increasingly out of step with the direction of travel in comparable jurisdictions, where courts and legislatures have shown a greater willingness to recognise corporate obligations framed through the language of human rights and environmental responsibility.

Apollo
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.