Effects of Magnetic Therapy and Biofeedback on Craniovertebral Angle, Balance Control, and Cervical Proprioception in Young Adults

Background: Forward head posture (FHP) and cervical proprioceptive deficits are increasingly prevalent among young adults due to prolonged digital device use. These dysfunctions are associated with impaired neuromuscular control, decreased postural stability, and elevated risk of neck pain. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of magnetic therapy and tilt-sensor-based biofeedback on cervical joint position sense, craniovertebral angle (CVA), and static balance control. Methods: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 27 college students aged 20–25 years. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: biofeedback (B group), magnetic therapy (M group), or a combination of both (BM group). Each intervention was administered for 30 minutes. Outcome measures included joint position error (JPE), CVA, and balance indices—stability index (SI) and weight distribution index (WDI)—collected before and after intervention. Results: The M group demonstrated significant improvements in JPE during left rotation and flexion (p<0.05). Between-group analysis showed significant differences in JPE flexion (p=0.003), particularly between the BM and M groups (p=0.0015). No statistically significant changes were observed in CVA or static balance measures across any group. Conclusion: Magnetic therapy showed immediate improvements in selected measures of cervical proprioception, while biofeedback alone or in combination demonstrated no significant short-term effects. However, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary immediate effects rather than evidence of established clinical utility. Future studies should investigate longer intervention periods and broader clinical populations to determine sustained efficacy and clinical relevance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of human movement and sports sciences
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2026.140420
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Magnetic Therapy and Biofeedback on Craniovertebral Angle, Balance Control, and Cervical Proprioception in Young Adults

Jinseop Kim, 남연교, JeongWoo Jeon, JiHoen Hong et al.
International journal of human movement and sports sciences
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Effects of Magnetic Therapy and Biofeedback on Craniovertebral Angle, Balance Control, and Cervical Proprioception in Young Adults

Jinseop Kim, 남연교, JeongWoo Jeon, JiHoen Hong, JungTae Yuk, DongYeop Lee, SungYeon Oh, JiSeok Oh, JaeHo Yu
article en

Abstract

Background: Forward head posture (FHP) and cervical proprioceptive deficits are increasingly prevalent among young adults due to prolonged digital device use. These dysfunctions are associated with impaired neuromuscular control, decreased postural stability, and elevated risk of neck pain. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of magnetic therapy and tilt-sensor-based biofeedback on cervical joint position sense, craniovertebral angle (CVA), and static balance control. Methods: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 27 college students aged 20–25 years. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: biofeedback (B group), magnetic therapy (M group), or a combination of both (BM group). Each intervention was administered for 30 minutes. Outcome measures included joint position error (JPE), CVA, and balance indices—stability index (SI) and weight distribution index (WDI)—collected before and after intervention. Results: The M group demonstrated significant improvements in JPE during left rotation and flexion (p<0.05). Between-group analysis showed significant differences in JPE flexion (p=0.003), particularly between the BM and M groups (p=0.0015). No statistically significant changes were observed in CVA or static balance measures across any group. Conclusion: Magnetic therapy showed immediate improvements in selected measures of cervical proprioception, while biofeedback alone or in combination demonstrated no significant short-term effects. However, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary immediate effects rather than evidence of established clinical utility. Future studies should investigate longer intervention periods and broader clinical populations to determine sustained efficacy and clinical relevance.

International journal of human movement and sports sciencesVol. 14(4)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.