Technical Success of Fetal Aortic Valvuloplasty in Relation to Center Volumes: A Report From the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry

BACKGROUND: The relationship between fetal aortic valvuloplasty procedural volume and outcomes is crucial to understand whether regionalization should be advised worldwide. This study utilizes the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry to examine the relationship between center volume for fetal aortic valvuloplasty and outcome metrics including procedure success, complications, and fetal death. METHODS: Data were included from institutions performing ≥3 procedures (2001-2018). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as ≥1 balloon inflation across the aortic valve, with increased antegrade flow across the valve and new aortic regurgitation. Secondary end points were procedural complications and fetal periprocedural death (within 48 hours). Univariable and Classification and Regression Tree analyses were performed. RESULTS: Eleven centers, with volumes ranging from 6 to 31 cases, performed 162 fetal aortic valvuloplasties with a technical success rate of 80.2%. Higher volume was not associated with better technical success or fewer complications but was associated with fewer periprocedural fetal deaths. Employing Classification and Regression Tree modeling, the largest drivers of improved outcomes for all measures were greater estimated fetal weight and gestational age. A single cardiac puncture was associated with greater technical success and fewer procedural complications after accounting for fetal estimated fetal weight and gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: In this registry cohort, higher-volume centers did not have greater fetal aortic valvuloplasty technical success or fewer complications but did have fewer periprocedural fetal deaths. Fetal gestational age and number of cardiac punctures influenced outcomes, suggesting that unmeasured fetal selection criteria, such as different referral patterns, and technical expertise, indicative of overall center/team experience, may influence fetal survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.125.015593
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Success of Fetal Aortic Valvuloplasty in Relation to Center Volumes: A Report From the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry

Ulrike Herberg, Manon Gijtenbeek, Monique C. Haak, Sarah Gelehrter et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Technical Success of Fetal Aortic Valvuloplasty in Relation to Center Volumes: A Report From the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry

Ulrike Herberg, Manon Gijtenbeek, Monique C. Haak, Sarah Gelehrter, Aimee K. Armstrong, Lucas Otaño, Shaine A. Morris, M. Cruz‐Lemini, Edgar Jaeggi, Helena M. Gardiner, Trisha V. Vigneswaran, James Strainic, Sophie Malekzadeh‐Milani, Anita J. Moon‐Grady, John Simpson, R. Cruz‐Martínez, Carlos Pedra, Jay Pruetz, Joanna Dangel, Sofia Grinenco, Simone R. Pedra, Ramen Chmait, Fabio Peralta, Alberto Galindo, Pablo Marantz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between fetal aortic valvuloplasty procedural volume and outcomes is crucial to understand whether regionalization should be advised worldwide. This study utilizes the International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry to examine the relationship between center volume for fetal aortic valvuloplasty and outcome metrics including procedure success, complications, and fetal death. METHODS: Data were included from institutions performing ≥3 procedures (2001-2018). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as ≥1 balloon inflation across the aortic valve, with increased antegrade flow across the valve and new aortic regurgitation. Secondary end points were procedural complications and fetal periprocedural death (within 48 hours). Univariable and Classification and Regression Tree analyses were performed. RESULTS: Eleven centers, with volumes ranging from 6 to 31 cases, performed 162 fetal aortic valvuloplasties with a technical success rate of 80.2%. Higher volume was not associated with better technical success or fewer complications but was associated with fewer periprocedural fetal deaths. Employing Classification and Regression Tree modeling, the largest drivers of improved outcomes for all measures were greater estimated fetal weight and gestational age. A single cardiac puncture was associated with greater technical success and fewer procedural complications after accounting for fetal estimated fetal weight and gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: In this registry cohort, higher-volume centers did not have greater fetal aortic valvuloplasty technical success or fewer complications but did have fewer periprocedural fetal deaths. Fetal gestational age and number of cardiac punctures influenced outcomes, suggesting that unmeasured fetal selection criteria, such as different referral patterns, and technical expertise, indicative of overall center/team experience, may influence fetal survival.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), University of Bonn (DE), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Hospital for Sick Children Pediatric Center (US), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Hospital Civil de Guadalajara (MX), Sant Joan de Déu Research Foundation (ES), Hospital do Coração (BR), Evelina London Children's Healthcare (GB), Texas Children's Hospital (US), Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US), C. S. Mott Children's Hospital (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.