Social Media Monitoring to Predict Bank Runs: Signals and Limitations

ABSTRACT This article examines whether real‐time social media monitoring could have provided early warning signals for recent bank runs by analysing sentiments and emotions in 160,000 tweets regarding Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Signature Bank (SBNY) and a control group of banks that did not experience runs. The results show statistically significant negative deviations in sentiment and emotions prior to the bank run for both SVB‐ and SBNY‐related tweets, with sharp increases being visually evident for SVB. The control group indicates that similar strong negative co‐movements across multiple sentiments and emotions do not usually occur in other banks. However, the analysis also shows that potential social media signals are prone to false positives within expectable fluctuations, making them unfavourable for practical applications as a standalone warning system. Furthermore, the findings highlight significant heterogeneity between social media reactions to different banks, emphasising that reliable thresholds for social media monitoring require bank‐specific calibration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Finance
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.70039
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Media Monitoring to Predict Bank Runs: Signals and Limitations

Konstantin Klaucke
International Finance
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Social Media Monitoring to Predict Bank Runs: Signals and Limitations

Konstantin Klaucke
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines whether real‐time social media monitoring could have provided early warning signals for recent bank runs by analysing sentiments and emotions in 160,000 tweets regarding Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Signature Bank (SBNY) and a control group of banks that did not experience runs. The results show statistically significant negative deviations in sentiment and emotions prior to the bank run for both SVB‐ and SBNY‐related tweets, with sharp increases being visually evident for SVB. The control group indicates that similar strong negative co‐movements across multiple sentiments and emotions do not usually occur in other banks. However, the analysis also shows that potential social media signals are prone to false positives within expectable fluctuations, making them unfavourable for practical applications as a standalone warning system. Furthermore, the findings highlight significant heterogeneity between social media reactions to different banks, emphasising that reliable thresholds for social media monitoring require bank‐specific calibration.

International Finance
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.