Field–System Coupling: An Architectural Instrument for AEW Coupling under Finite Horizons

The paper links field-level admissibility constraints to system-level accountable execution and clarifies why boundary conditions, enacted operation, and witness must remain visibly coupled under finite horizons. Within Fractal Onto-Praxis (FOP), an instrument is not a technical device or software tool, but an architectural construct that makes a structural relation explicit enough to be used across later theoretical and operational work. Field–System Coupling functions in this sense as an architectural bridge between Fractal Onto-Praxis (FOP), Admissibility–Execution–Witness (AEW) coupling, and later scale-transition results. The paper does not propose a new algorithm, empirical model, therapeutic method, or control protocol. It provides a public-facing theoretical clarification of the field/system/witness relation required for accountable viability under finite horizons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20612773
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field–System Coupling: An Architectural Instrument for AEW Coupling under Finite Horizons

Panagiotis Kalomoirakis
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

Field–System Coupling: An Architectural Instrument for AEW Coupling under Finite Horizons

Panagiotis Kalomoirakis
article en

Abstract

The paper links field-level admissibility constraints to system-level accountable execution and clarifies why boundary conditions, enacted operation, and witness must remain visibly coupled under finite horizons. Within Fractal Onto-Praxis (FOP), an instrument is not a technical device or software tool, but an architectural construct that makes a structural relation explicit enough to be used across later theoretical and operational work. Field–System Coupling functions in this sense as an architectural bridge between Fractal Onto-Praxis (FOP), Admissibility–Execution–Witness (AEW) coupling, and later scale-transition results. The paper does not propose a new algorithm, empirical model, therapeutic method, or control protocol. It provides a public-facing theoretical clarification of the field/system/witness relation required for accountable viability under finite horizons.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Field–System Coupling: An Architectural Instrument for AEW Coupling under Finite Horizons — Panagiotis Kalomoirakis · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS