Physician-patient discordance in Bristol stool scale classification and overall IBS burden assessment

Background: The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is widely used to assess stool consistency and subtype irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial comparing patient self-reported BSFS with physician-assessed BSFS. Baseline symptom severity and quality-of-life questionnaires were also collected. Results: Agreement was poor across the 7-point scale (κ=-0.01, p=0.77) and after collapsing into three categories (κ=0.04, p=0.46), with concordance in only 18/64 cases (28%). Symptom severity and quality-of-life scores were similar between concordant and discordant groups. Discussion: Patient-reported BSFS may not reliably reflect stool consistency or overall IBS burden, suggesting caution when using BSFS alone for monitoring or subtyping IBS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004077
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physician-patient discordance in Bristol stool scale classification and overall IBS burden assessment

Tal Engel, Offir Ukashi, M Tzur, Chen Faibis et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Physician-patient discordance in Bristol stool scale classification and overall IBS burden assessment

Tal Engel, Offir Ukashi, M Tzur, Chen Faibis, Dan Carter, S Ben-Horin
article en

Abstract

Background: The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is widely used to assess stool consistency and subtype irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial comparing patient self-reported BSFS with physician-assessed BSFS. Baseline symptom severity and quality-of-life questionnaires were also collected. Results: Agreement was poor across the 7-point scale (κ=-0.01, p=0.77) and after collapsing into three categories (κ=0.04, p=0.46), with concordance in only 18/64 cases (28%). Symptom severity and quality-of-life scores were similar between concordant and discordant groups. Discussion: Patient-reported BSFS may not reliably reflect stool consistency or overall IBS burden, suggesting caution when using BSFS alone for monitoring or subtyping IBS.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Sheba Medical Center (IL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Physician-patient discordance in Bristol stool scale classification and overall IBS burden assessment — Tal Engel, Offir Ukashi, et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS