Efficacy and safety of nasal mask compared to nasal cannula during procedural sedation in gastroscopy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is the most common adverse event during propofol-based procedural sedation for gastroscopy. Conventional nasal cannula oxygenation provides low flow rates, permitting room air entrainment and often proving insufficient. Nasal mask oxygenation delivers higher inspired oxygen concentrations, potentially enhancing respiratory safety during sedation. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of nasal mask versus nasal cannula oxygen delivery during propofol-based procedural sedation for gastroscopy. METHODS: Electronic databases/registries were systematically searched from inception to January 24, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Inclusion criteria encompassed adult patients undergoing propofol-based sedation for gastroscopy. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes included severe hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation (SpO₂), need for airway or oxygenation interventions, procedure-related adverse events, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) assessed the sufficiency of the evidence. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Five RCTs enrolled 1,267 patients, of whom 1,252 (98.8%) were included in the quantitative synthesis. Nasal mask oxygenation significantly reduced hypoxemia (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58, p < 0.0001) and severe hypoxemia (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67, p = 0.0007) compared with nasal cannula. Nasal masks also decreased the need for jaw thrust (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.52) and mask-assisted ventilation (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.46), while elevating minimum SpO₂ (MD 3.78, 95% CI 1.39 to 6.16). No significant differences emerged in coughing, hiccups, or PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal mask oxygenation is associated with greater respiratory safety compared with nasal cannula oxygenation during propofol-sedated gastroscopy. This advantage manifests as reduced incidence of hypoxemia and fewer airway-related interventions, alongside a comparable overall safety profile. PROSPERO: CRD420261291468.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03973-y
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of nasal mask compared to nasal cannula during procedural sedation in gastroscopy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Ayham Qatza, Engy Elkoury, Munder Lateiresh, Mohamed Yaseen Alfeetouri et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Efficacy and safety of nasal mask compared to nasal cannula during procedural sedation in gastroscopy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Ayham Qatza, Engy Elkoury, Munder Lateiresh, Mohamed Yaseen Alfeetouri, Nuran Arif Benfaid, Muhammed Elhadi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is the most common adverse event during propofol-based procedural sedation for gastroscopy. Conventional nasal cannula oxygenation provides low flow rates, permitting room air entrainment and often proving insufficient. Nasal mask oxygenation delivers higher inspired oxygen concentrations, potentially enhancing respiratory safety during sedation. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and safety of nasal mask versus nasal cannula oxygen delivery during propofol-based procedural sedation for gastroscopy. METHODS: Electronic databases/registries were systematically searched from inception to January 24, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Inclusion criteria encompassed adult patients undergoing propofol-based sedation for gastroscopy. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes included severe hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation (SpO₂), need for airway or oxygenation interventions, procedure-related adverse events, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) assessed the sufficiency of the evidence. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS: Five RCTs enrolled 1,267 patients, of whom 1,252 (98.8%) were included in the quantitative synthesis. Nasal mask oxygenation significantly reduced hypoxemia (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.58, p < 0.0001) and severe hypoxemia (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.67, p = 0.0007) compared with nasal cannula. Nasal masks also decreased the need for jaw thrust (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.52) and mask-assisted ventilation (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.46), while elevating minimum SpO₂ (MD 3.78, 95% CI 1.39 to 6.16). No significant differences emerged in coughing, hiccups, or PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal mask oxygenation is associated with greater respiratory safety compared with nasal cannula oxygenation during propofol-sedated gastroscopy. This advantage manifests as reduced incidence of hypoxemia and fewer airway-related interventions, alongside a comparable overall safety profile. PROSPERO: CRD420261291468.

BMC Anesthesiology
University of East Sarajevo (BA), Korea University (KR), Tanta University (EG), University of Tripoli (LY), University of Benghazi (LY), Korea University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.