Clinical Trial: Predicting Response to Iron Therapy in Patients With Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Hepcidin and Functional Iron Indices: A Multicentre Randomised Trial

ABSTRACT Background Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and impairs quality of life. Hepcidin, the regulator of systemic iron homeostasis, may predict response to iron therapy; however, its utility in IBD remains unclear. This study evaluated whether baseline hepcidin predicts response to oral and intravenous (IV) iron in active IBD to guide personalised treatment. Methods Ninety adults with active IBD and iron deficiency (with or without anaemia) from two randomised trials received IV iron, oral ferrous fumarate (FF) or oral ferric maltol (FM). Response at 12 weeks was defined as haemoglobin increase ≥ 1.2 mmol/L (19.3 g/L) or normalisation in IDA or ferritin > 100 μg/L and transferrin saturation > 20% in iron deficient patients. Baseline iron indices including ferritin, hepcidin, and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) were measured. Logistic regression and receiver operating curve analyses evaluated predictive performance. Results Baseline hepcidin strongly predicted response to iron therapy: AUC (FF) : 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71–1.00 and AUC (IV) : 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30–0.96. Hepcidin > 2.68 μg/mL identified non‐responders to FF with 89% sensitivity and 77% specificity. Each twofold increase in baseline hepcidin or ferritin reduced the odds of response [log 2 (hepcidin) OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.89; log 2 (ferritin) OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21–0.69]. Higher transferrin/log 10 (ferritin) (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.38–6.30) and sTfR/log 10 (ferritin) ratios (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05–1.59) increased likelihood of response. Conclusion Baseline hepcidin supports route selection for iron therapy: higher levels favour IV iron, while lower levels indicate likely oral response. Ferritin‐based indices, notably transferrin/log 10 (ferritin), offer pragmatic alternatives where hepcidin testing is unavailable. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05581420 and NCT05456932

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70775
Primary Topic
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Trial: Predicting Response to Iron Therapy in Patients With Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Hepcidin and Functional Iron Indices: A Multicentre Randomised Trial

Rogier L. Goetgebuer, Roberta Loveikyte, Sander van der Marel, Annemarie C. de Vries et al.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
article

Clinical Trial: Predicting Response to Iron Therapy in Patients With Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Hepcidin and Functional Iron Indices: A Multicentre Randomised Trial

Rogier L. Goetgebuer, Roberta Loveikyte, Sander van der Marel, Annemarie C. de Vries, Andrea E. van der Meulen‐de Jong, Lola J. M. Koppelman, the Dutch Iron Study Group, Gerard Dijkstra
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and impairs quality of life. Hepcidin, the regulator of systemic iron homeostasis, may predict response to iron therapy; however, its utility in IBD remains unclear. This study evaluated whether baseline hepcidin predicts response to oral and intravenous (IV) iron in active IBD to guide personalised treatment. Methods Ninety adults with active IBD and iron deficiency (with or without anaemia) from two randomised trials received IV iron, oral ferrous fumarate (FF) or oral ferric maltol (FM). Response at 12 weeks was defined as haemoglobin increase ≥ 1.2 mmol/L (19.3 g/L) or normalisation in IDA or ferritin > 100 μg/L and transferrin saturation > 20% in iron deficient patients. Baseline iron indices including ferritin, hepcidin, and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) were measured. Logistic regression and receiver operating curve analyses evaluated predictive performance. Results Baseline hepcidin strongly predicted response to iron therapy: AUC (FF) : 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71–1.00 and AUC (IV) : 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30–0.96. Hepcidin > 2.68 μg/mL identified non‐responders to FF with 89% sensitivity and 77% specificity. Each twofold increase in baseline hepcidin or ferritin reduced the odds of response [log 2 (hepcidin) OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.89; log 2 (ferritin) OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.21–0.69]. Higher transferrin/log 10 (ferritin) (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.38–6.30) and sTfR/log 10 (ferritin) ratios (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05–1.59) increased likelihood of response. Conclusion Baseline hepcidin supports route selection for iron therapy: higher levels favour IV iron, while lower levels indicate likely oral response. Ferritin‐based indices, notably transferrin/log 10 (ferritin), offer pragmatic alternatives where hepcidin testing is unavailable. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05581420 and NCT05456932

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Medisch Centrum Haaglanden (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Iron Metabolism and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.