LEXICAL-SEMANTIC FOUNDATIONS BEHIND THE FORMATION OF SOMATIC-COMPONENT RIDDLES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

The present paper looks into how body-part vocabulary supplies the lexical and semantic raw material out of which riddles are built in English and Uzbek. Working within a contrastive framework, the author gathers riddle texts whose key word names a part of the body, sorts those key words into meaning-based clusters, and traces the two transfer routes – one resting on resemblance, the other on adjacency – by which an organ name comes to stand for some everyday object. The comparison suggests a double picture: the underlying habit of describing the world by way of one’s own body recurs in both traditions, yet which organ is chosen, what object it points to, and what emotional colouring it carries are settled differently in each language. These observations bear on contrastive lexicology, folklore scholarship, the theory of translation, and the teaching of foreign languages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20606164
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEXICAL-SEMANTIC FOUNDATIONS BEHIND THE FORMATION OF SOMATIC-COMPONENT RIDDLES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Yokutkhon Rakhmonkulova Tukhtasin kizi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
article

LEXICAL-SEMANTIC FOUNDATIONS BEHIND THE FORMATION OF SOMATIC-COMPONENT RIDDLES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Yokutkhon Rakhmonkulova Tukhtasin kizi
article en

Abstract

The present paper looks into how body-part vocabulary supplies the lexical and semantic raw material out of which riddles are built in English and Uzbek. Working within a contrastive framework, the author gathers riddle texts whose key word names a part of the body, sorts those key words into meaning-based clusters, and traces the two transfer routes – one resting on resemblance, the other on adjacency – by which an organ name comes to stand for some everyday object. The comparison suggests a double picture: the underlying habit of describing the world by way of one’s own body recurs in both traditions, yet which organ is chosen, what object it points to, and what emotional colouring it carries are settled differently in each language. These observations bear on contrastive lexicology, folklore scholarship, the theory of translation, and the teaching of foreign languages.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.