Primitive Axiomatics of Finite Obstruction Calculus

Finite evaluation systems—such as distributed logs, constraint solvers, and multi-agent pipelines—often produce local comparisons that cannot be globally reconciled. This paper states the primitive axiomatics for a finite obstruction calculus, providing a bounded diagnostic framework for evaluating such failures. By modeling local comparisons as an evaluation preorder over a chosen finite simplicial carrier, the framework supports a three-way classification of observed inconsistencies:1. Removable Gauge Artifacts: Inconsistencies resolvable by local reference changes.2. Closed Obstructions: Irreducible residual obstructions, measured by the quotient residual mass (Φ₁).3. Closure Failures: Active non-closed ruptures, measured by the d₁-closure charge (Γ₂). The core diagnostic is the bounded obstruction signature (Φ₁, Γ₂, R_{cl}). Crucially, this axiomatics separates the derived algebraic structure from observer-dependent metric choices. It shows in this framework that measured magnitude is selected by the observer's specific scalar gauges, aggregation laws, and transformation monoids, explicitly avoiding universal ℓ¹ assumptions. Limits & Scope:This foundation is strictly finite and separated. It does not support or claim a universal ℓ¹ norm, nor does it make claims regarding quantum mechanics, the Born rule, or physical gauge groups. Vector-valued and quantum branches are relegated to companion papers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20616143
Primary Topic
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Primitive Axiomatics of Finite Obstruction Calculus

JEREMY H. CARROLL
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
preprint

Primitive Axiomatics of Finite Obstruction Calculus

JEREMY H. CARROLL
preprint en

Abstract

Finite evaluation systems—such as distributed logs, constraint solvers, and multi-agent pipelines—often produce local comparisons that cannot be globally reconciled. This paper states the primitive axiomatics for a finite obstruction calculus, providing a bounded diagnostic framework for evaluating such failures. By modeling local comparisons as an evaluation preorder over a chosen finite simplicial carrier, the framework supports a three-way classification of observed inconsistencies:1. Removable Gauge Artifacts: Inconsistencies resolvable by local reference changes.2. Closed Obstructions: Irreducible residual obstructions, measured by the quotient residual mass (Φ₁).3. Closure Failures: Active non-closed ruptures, measured by the d₁-closure charge (Γ₂). The core diagnostic is the bounded obstruction signature (Φ₁, Γ₂, R_{cl}). Crucially, this axiomatics separates the derived algebraic structure from observer-dependent metric choices. It shows in this framework that measured magnitude is selected by the observer's specific scalar gauges, aggregation laws, and transformation monoids, explicitly avoiding universal ℓ¹ assumptions. Limits & Scope:This foundation is strictly finite and separated. It does not support or claim a universal ℓ¹ norm, nor does it make claims regarding quantum mechanics, the Born rule, or physical gauge groups. Vector-valued and quantum branches are relegated to companion papers.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.