Indirect state-level estimation of sexual minority adolescent populations by sex, age, and race/ethnicity using random forests

PURPOSE: Estimating population sizes of adolescents who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) is important for addressing health needs and disparities. Most states have Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS) among high school students, but not all include an item about sexual identity. This study's aim was to estimate the percentages of students identifying as LGB stratified by sex, age, and race and ethnicity where state data is incomplete. States where 2021 YRBS data are not available are outside the scope of this study. METHODS: We developed two random forests trained separately for each sex and evaluated the models' performance in predicting percentages of respondents identifying as LGB by state and demographic strata. We then estimated percentages for states that did not include or have responses to the LGB identity question available in 2021. RESULTS: The random forests outperformed benchmark comparison models based on a simple logistic regression approach. Estimates of students who identify as LGB across demographic strata and states ranged 5%-30%. The estimated percentages for states that did not ask students about sexual identity fell within the same range. CONCLUSION: Our approach to deriving state-level estimates of LGB students by sex, race and ethnicity, and age performs well and can be used to inform efforts to improve health and well-being of LGB youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349759
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indirect state-level estimation of sexual minority adolescent populations by sex, age, and race/ethnicity using random forests

Sanjana Pampati, Lijia Zheng, Joshua A. Salomon, Reza Yaesoubi et al.
PLoS ONE
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Indirect state-level estimation of sexual minority adolescent populations by sex, age, and race/ethnicity using random forests

Sanjana Pampati, Lijia Zheng, Joshua A. Salomon, Reza Yaesoubi, Bruno Alves-Maciel, Michelle Van Handel, Ziping Ye, Ari Fodeman
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Estimating population sizes of adolescents who identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) is important for addressing health needs and disparities. Most states have Youth Risk Behavior Surveys (YRBS) among high school students, but not all include an item about sexual identity. This study's aim was to estimate the percentages of students identifying as LGB stratified by sex, age, and race and ethnicity where state data is incomplete. States where 2021 YRBS data are not available are outside the scope of this study. METHODS: We developed two random forests trained separately for each sex and evaluated the models' performance in predicting percentages of respondents identifying as LGB by state and demographic strata. We then estimated percentages for states that did not include or have responses to the LGB identity question available in 2021. RESULTS: The random forests outperformed benchmark comparison models based on a simple logistic regression approach. Estimates of students who identify as LGB across demographic strata and states ranged 5%-30%. The estimated percentages for states that did not ask students about sexual identity fell within the same range. CONCLUSION: Our approach to deriving state-level estimates of LGB students by sex, race and ethnicity, and age performs well and can be used to inform efforts to improve health and well-being of LGB youth.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Yale University (US), Stanford Health Care (US), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US), National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.