Implicit self-esteem and self-esteem discrepancy: Implications for dynamic facial expression sensitivity and psychological wellbeing

Background Facial cues of social acceptance and rejection play an important role in social interaction. Although explicit (self-reported) self-esteem (ESE) has been linked to social cue sensitivity, and implicit self-esteem (ISE) and self-esteem discrepancy size (SEDS; the absolute difference between standardised ESE and ISE) have been associated with biased interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions, their roles in perceptual sensitivity to facial expressions of acceptance and rejection remain unclear. Objective This study examined associations between ESE, ISE, SEDS, facial expression sensitivity, and psychological wellbeing. Methods Participants ( N = 225) completed an emotion detection task using morphed neutral-to-full-intensity facial expressions (disgust, anger, happiness, fear), alongside measures of psychological wellbeing, ESE (self-report), and ISE (implicit association test); age was controlled for in exploratory analyses. Hierarchical multiple regression and mediation analyses were conducted. Results Hierarchical multiple regression showed that lower ISE and higher SEDS predicted greater sensitivity to negative expressions. Mediation analyses indicated that greater sensitivity to disgust and anger corresponded to lower ISE and higher SEDS, which in turn corresponded to poorer relational wellbeing and higher autonomy, respectively. Implications These findings identify ISE and SEDS as factors shaping sensitivity to socially meaningful facial cues and associated dimensions of psychological wellbeing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Individual Differences
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2026.113933
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit self-esteem and self-esteem discrepancy: Implications for dynamic facial expression sensitivity and psychological wellbeing

Petra M.J. Pollux, Patrycja Korzeniowska, Kun Guo
Personality and Individual Differences
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Implicit self-esteem and self-esteem discrepancy: Implications for dynamic facial expression sensitivity and psychological wellbeing

Petra M.J. Pollux, Patrycja Korzeniowska, Kun Guo
article en

Abstract

Background Facial cues of social acceptance and rejection play an important role in social interaction. Although explicit (self-reported) self-esteem (ESE) has been linked to social cue sensitivity, and implicit self-esteem (ISE) and self-esteem discrepancy size (SEDS; the absolute difference between standardised ESE and ISE) have been associated with biased interpretation of ambiguous facial expressions, their roles in perceptual sensitivity to facial expressions of acceptance and rejection remain unclear. Objective This study examined associations between ESE, ISE, SEDS, facial expression sensitivity, and psychological wellbeing. Methods Participants ( N = 225) completed an emotion detection task using morphed neutral-to-full-intensity facial expressions (disgust, anger, happiness, fear), alongside measures of psychological wellbeing, ESE (self-report), and ISE (implicit association test); age was controlled for in exploratory analyses. Hierarchical multiple regression and mediation analyses were conducted. Results Hierarchical multiple regression showed that lower ISE and higher SEDS predicted greater sensitivity to negative expressions. Mediation analyses indicated that greater sensitivity to disgust and anger corresponded to lower ISE and higher SEDS, which in turn corresponded to poorer relational wellbeing and higher autonomy, respectively. Implications These findings identify ISE and SEDS as factors shaping sensitivity to socially meaningful facial cues and associated dimensions of psychological wellbeing.

Personality and Individual DifferencesVol. 262
University of Lincoln (GB)
British Phycological Society
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.