Parental Influence and Interest Alignment as Predictors of Perceived Academic Difficulty among Psychology Students of Laguna University

This study examined the predictive effects of parental influence and interest alignment on perceived academic difficulty among undergraduate Psychology students at Laguna University. Perceived academic difficulty refers to students’ subjective evaluation of academic challenges, which may be influenced by environmental and personal factors. Guided by Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the study explored how parental influence, as an external factor, and interest alignment, as an internal factor, contribute to students’ academic experiences. Specifically, the research aimed to determine whether parental influence and interest alignment significantly predict perceived academic difficulty among Psychology students. A quantitative cross-sectional regression design was employed in the study. Data were collected from 195 undergraduate Psychology students through convenience sampling using a self-constructed survey questionnaire validated by registered psychometricians. Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were utilized to determine the levels of parental influence and interest alignment, while multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the predictive relationship among the variables. Findings revealed a moderate level of parental influence (M = 2.91, SD = 0.98), suggesting parental involvement without excessive control. Respondents also demonstrated a moderate to high level of interest alignment, indicating consistency between their chosen academic program and personal interests. Regression analysis showed that the model was statistically significant, F(2, 192) = 25.4, p < .001, confirming that parental influence and interest alignment significantly predicted perceived academic difficulty. The model accounted for 20.9% of the variance in academic difficulty (R² = .209, Adjusted R² = .201). Interest alignment emerged as a stronger predictor, wherein higher alignment was associated with lower perceived academic difficulty. The findings emphasize the importance of balanced parental involvement, student autonomy, and strengthened career guidance initiatives in supporting academic adjustment, improving educational experiences, and promoting informed college program selection among students.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i12-1718674
Primary Topic
Educational Outcomes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental Influence and Interest Alignment as Predictors of Perceived Academic Difficulty among Psychology Students of Laguna University

Ella Mae O. Monteza, Miracle Amos V. De Guzman, Khen Aerald L. Batulinao
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Educational Outcomes and Influences
article

Parental Influence and Interest Alignment as Predictors of Perceived Academic Difficulty among Psychology Students of Laguna University

Ella Mae O. Monteza, Miracle Amos V. De Guzman, Khen Aerald L. Batulinao
article en

Abstract

This study examined the predictive effects of parental influence and interest alignment on perceived academic difficulty among undergraduate Psychology students at Laguna University. Perceived academic difficulty refers to students’ subjective evaluation of academic challenges, which may be influenced by environmental and personal factors. Guided by Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the study explored how parental influence, as an external factor, and interest alignment, as an internal factor, contribute to students’ academic experiences. Specifically, the research aimed to determine whether parental influence and interest alignment significantly predict perceived academic difficulty among Psychology students. A quantitative cross-sectional regression design was employed in the study. Data were collected from 195 undergraduate Psychology students through convenience sampling using a self-constructed survey questionnaire validated by registered psychometricians. Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were utilized to determine the levels of parental influence and interest alignment, while multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to examine the predictive relationship among the variables. Findings revealed a moderate level of parental influence (M = 2.91, SD = 0.98), suggesting parental involvement without excessive control. Respondents also demonstrated a moderate to high level of interest alignment, indicating consistency between their chosen academic program and personal interests. Regression analysis showed that the model was statistically significant, F(2, 192) = 25.4, p < .001, confirming that parental influence and interest alignment significantly predicted perceived academic difficulty. The model accounted for 20.9% of the variance in academic difficulty (R² = .209, Adjusted R² = .201). Interest alignment emerged as a stronger predictor, wherein higher alignment was associated with lower perceived academic difficulty. The findings emphasize the importance of balanced parental involvement, student autonomy, and strengthened career guidance initiatives in supporting academic adjustment, improving educational experiences, and promoting informed college program selection among students.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Outcomes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.