A Biological Learning Theory: How We Learn in the Era of AI

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, yet its impact on learning remains minimally theorized. Existing pedagogical models rarely address AI’s role, leading to misapplications - such as comparing student performance to AI outputs - without understanding how AI influences learning. This paper proposes a biological theory of learning grounded in autopoiesis and adaptation, reframing learning as a process of biological change driven by energy modulation and the regulation of biological perturbation. We revisit foundational assumptions about human nature and analyze three scenarios: (1) AI versus traditional tools, (2) human-human versus human-AI interaction, and (3) the learner’s relationship with AI. This framework moves beyond debates like constructivism versus behaviorism, offering a deeper understanding of learning as embodied transformation. AI is not merely the context for this framework but the phenomenon that renders it necessary: by producing learning-like outputs without biological learning, AI forces a precision in the definition of learning that no prior technology demanded. Ultimately, we challenge the trend of modeling students after AI systems, advocating instead for educational environments that honor complexity, emotion, and human adaptability. We ground these arguments in science education as the domain where AI’s entry into learning environments is most acute and where the biological dimensions of learning — hands-on experimentation, sensory perturbation, and embodied inquiry — are most clearly at stake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10340-6
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Biological Learning Theory: How We Learn in the Era of AI

Miguél Nussbaum, Zvi Bekerman, Brayan Díaz
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

A Biological Learning Theory: How We Learn in the Era of AI

Miguél Nussbaum, Zvi Bekerman, Brayan Díaz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming education, yet its impact on learning remains minimally theorized. Existing pedagogical models rarely address AI’s role, leading to misapplications - such as comparing student performance to AI outputs - without understanding how AI influences learning. This paper proposes a biological theory of learning grounded in autopoiesis and adaptation, reframing learning as a process of biological change driven by energy modulation and the regulation of biological perturbation. We revisit foundational assumptions about human nature and analyze three scenarios: (1) AI versus traditional tools, (2) human-human versus human-AI interaction, and (3) the learner’s relationship with AI. This framework moves beyond debates like constructivism versus behaviorism, offering a deeper understanding of learning as embodied transformation. AI is not merely the context for this framework but the phenomenon that renders it necessary: by producing learning-like outputs without biological learning, AI forces a precision in the definition of learning that no prior technology demanded. Ultimately, we challenge the trend of modeling students after AI systems, advocating instead for educational environments that honor complexity, emotion, and human adaptability. We ground these arguments in science education as the domain where AI’s entry into learning environments is most acute and where the biological dimensions of learning — hands-on experimentation, sensory perturbation, and embodied inquiry — are most clearly at stake.

Journal of Science Education and Technology
Utah State University (US), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Chilean Air Force (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Biological Learning Theory: How We Learn in the Era of AI — Miguél Nussbaum, Zvi Bekerman, et al. · Journal of Science Education and Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS