Reciprocity in people’s non-statutory shelter strategies in Brussels

This paper examines how individuals experiencing homelessness in Brussels navigate reciprocal networks to secure non-statutory shelter through sofa surfing and squatting. Drawing on 22 housing biographies, the study explores the dynamics of reciprocity beyond kinship ties, highlighting its potential and fragility in highly precarious contexts. While these arrangements offer temporary relief, they often involve power imbalances and can lead to exploitation or negative reciprocity. Using Polanyi’s framework of economic integration spheres, the analysis situates reciprocity as a vital yet underexplored mechanism for meeting shelter needs, contrasting it with market and redistributive logics. Findings underscore that informal strategies are not merely coping practices but acts of claiming humanity and, in some cases, political visibility. Policy implications include recognising sofa surfing as homelessness, supporting dignified squatting initiatives, and leveraging reciprocal systems for alternative housing models that reintroduce care into dwelling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Housing Policy
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2026.2682632
Primary Topic
Migration, Identity, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reciprocity in people’s non-statutory shelter strategies in Brussels

Harm Deleu, Mieke Schrooten
International Journal of Housing Policy
Migration, Identity, and Health
article

Reciprocity in people’s non-statutory shelter strategies in Brussels

Harm Deleu, Mieke Schrooten
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how individuals experiencing homelessness in Brussels navigate reciprocal networks to secure non-statutory shelter through sofa surfing and squatting. Drawing on 22 housing biographies, the study explores the dynamics of reciprocity beyond kinship ties, highlighting its potential and fragility in highly precarious contexts. While these arrangements offer temporary relief, they often involve power imbalances and can lead to exploitation or negative reciprocity. Using Polanyi’s framework of economic integration spheres, the analysis situates reciprocity as a vital yet underexplored mechanism for meeting shelter needs, contrasting it with market and redistributive logics. Findings underscore that informal strategies are not merely coping practices but acts of claiming humanity and, in some cases, political visibility. Policy implications include recognising sofa surfing as homelessness, supporting dignified squatting initiatives, and leveraging reciprocal systems for alternative housing models that reintroduce care into dwelling.

International Journal of Housing Policy
University of Antwerp (BE), Odisee, University of Applied Sciences (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Identity, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.