C-713/23 Wojewoda Mazowiecki judgment: Abandoning the ‘Free Movement Purpose’ Approach to Civil Status Recognition?

More than seven years after the Coman judgment prompted sustained scholarly discussion, the CJEU has revisited the issue of same-sex marriage recognition in Wojewoda Mazowiecki, further strengthening the protection afforded to Union citizens. Delivered on 25 November 2025, the ruling is noteworthy for two principal reasons. Unlike Coman, which concerned recognition primarily for residence purposes of a third-country national spouse, the present case involves two Union citizens whose free movement rights arise directly from Articles 20 and 21 TFEU. In addition, the CJEU departed from the limited recognition model adopted in Coman, extending the obligation of recognition to encompass the full legal effects of a same-sex marriage lawfully concluded in another Member State. The judgment, therefore, signals a shift in the CJEU’s approach to civil status recognition. This article examines the ruling after outlining the facts, the AG’s Opinion, and the CJEU’s reasoning. It analyses the judgment from three angles: Union citizenship and free movement, the evolving boundaries of civil status recognition, and the role of national identity and public policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/897
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C-713/23 Wojewoda Mazowiecki judgment: Abandoning the ‘Free Movement Purpose’ Approach to Civil Status Recognition?

Helga Luku
Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

C-713/23 Wojewoda Mazowiecki judgment: Abandoning the ‘Free Movement Purpose’ Approach to Civil Status Recognition?

Helga Luku
article en

Abstract

More than seven years after the Coman judgment prompted sustained scholarly discussion, the CJEU has revisited the issue of same-sex marriage recognition in Wojewoda Mazowiecki, further strengthening the protection afforded to Union citizens. Delivered on 25 November 2025, the ruling is noteworthy for two principal reasons. Unlike Coman, which concerned recognition primarily for residence purposes of a third-country national spouse, the present case involves two Union citizens whose free movement rights arise directly from Articles 20 and 21 TFEU. In addition, the CJEU departed from the limited recognition model adopted in Coman, extending the obligation of recognition to encompass the full legal effects of a same-sex marriage lawfully concluded in another Member State. The judgment, therefore, signals a shift in the CJEU’s approach to civil status recognition. This article examines the ruling after outlining the facts, the AG’s Opinion, and the CJEU’s reasoning. It analyses the judgment from three angles: Union citizenship and free movement, the evolving boundaries of civil status recognition, and the role of national identity and public policy.

Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza”
Center for International Environmental Law (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

C-713/23 Wojewoda Mazowiecki judgment: Abandoning the ‘Free Movement Purpose’ Approach to Civil Status Recognition? — Helga Luku · Università degli Studi di Roma “Unitelma Sapienza” (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS