Comparison of sacral erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric hypospadias surgery: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential in pediatric urogenital surgery to reduce stress responses and opioid exposure. Caudal epidural block is widely used for hypospadias repair; however, its duration may be limited and it is associated with neuraxial-related concerns. Sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently emerged as a potential alternative regional technique. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of sacral ESP block and caudal epidural block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. METHODS: of 0.25% bupivacaine. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively by a blinded observer. The primary outcome was FLACC score at postoperative 12 h. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at other time points, time to first rescue analgesic, postoperative analgesic consumption, and block-related complications. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were analyzed (43 per group), with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Median FLACC scores were significantly lower in the sacral ESP group at all postoperative time points, including the primary endpoint at 12 h (0 [0-0] vs. 1 [0-2], p < 0.001). Time to first rescue analgesic was significantly longer in the sacral ESP group (mean 22.7 h, 95% CI 21.5-23.9) compared with the caudal group (13.7 h, 95% CI 10.9-16.6; p < 0.001). The median number of postoperative analgesic administrations was lower in the sacral ESP group (0 [0-0] vs. 1 [0-1], p < 0.001). No block-related complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block was associated with lower postoperative pain scores, prolonged time to rescue analgesia, and reduced analgesic consumption compared with caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias surgery. Sacral ESP block may represent a useful alternative to caudal epidural block; however, randomized controlled studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07286786.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perioperative Medicine
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-026-00705-1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of sacral erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric hypospadias surgery: a prospective observational study

Engin İhsan Turan, Sümeyye Kankal, Volkan Özen, Mert Bozdana et al.
Perioperative Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Comparison of sacral erector spinae plane block and caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric hypospadias surgery: a prospective observational study

Engin İhsan Turan, Sümeyye Kankal, Volkan Özen, Mert Bozdana, Bahadır Çiftçi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective postoperative analgesia is essential in pediatric urogenital surgery to reduce stress responses and opioid exposure. Caudal epidural block is widely used for hypospadias repair; however, its duration may be limited and it is associated with neuraxial-related concerns. Sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block has recently emerged as a potential alternative regional technique. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of sacral ESP block and caudal epidural block in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. METHODS: of 0.25% bupivacaine. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively by a blinded observer. The primary outcome was FLACC score at postoperative 12 h. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at other time points, time to first rescue analgesic, postoperative analgesic consumption, and block-related complications. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were analyzed (43 per group), with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Median FLACC scores were significantly lower in the sacral ESP group at all postoperative time points, including the primary endpoint at 12 h (0 [0-0] vs. 1 [0-2], p < 0.001). Time to first rescue analgesic was significantly longer in the sacral ESP group (mean 22.7 h, 95% CI 21.5-23.9) compared with the caudal group (13.7 h, 95% CI 10.9-16.6; p < 0.001). The median number of postoperative analgesic administrations was lower in the sacral ESP group (0 [0-0] vs. 1 [0-1], p < 0.001). No block-related complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block was associated with lower postoperative pain scores, prolonged time to rescue analgesia, and reduced analgesic consumption compared with caudal epidural block in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias surgery. Sacral ESP block may represent a useful alternative to caudal epidural block; however, randomized controlled studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07286786.

Perioperative Medicine
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR), İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.