Continuing Vs. Withholding Home Beta-Blockers at Admission for Suspected Infection: A Target Trial Emulation

OBJECTIVE: Beta-blockers are commonly prescribed for chronic cardiovascular diseases. Despite potential benefits in septic shock, beta-blockers are often held at hospital admission for patients with suspected infection and possible sepsis. We compared the effects of chronic beta-blocker continuation vs. discontinuation on 90-day all-cause mortality among patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected infection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the target trial emulation framework. We used Cox regression to compare 90-day mortality between treatment groups, with inverse probability of treatment weights to account for baseline differences in sex, race, ethnicity, age, body mass index, presence of a "do not resuscitate" order, comorbidities, and acute illness severity. SETTING: A single large, academic, tertiary care emergency department in the Midwest United States. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years or older on beta-blockers prior to admission hospitalized for suspected infection (defined by orders for blood cultures and broad-spectrum antibiotics). Patients with shock, heart rates less than 40 or greater than 120, or who required an IV beta- or calcium channel blocker at a clinician's discretion were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Continuation of oral beta-blockers within 48 hours of admission vs. no continuation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 4635 eligible patients, 1172 (25.3%) received an oral beta-blocker, whereas 3463 (74.7%) did not receive an oral beta-blocker. Beta-blocker continuation was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality within 90 days of hospital admission (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; p = 0.03) and shorter hospital stay (incidence rate ratio 0.39; 95% CI, 0.38-0.41; p < 0.001). There was no significant association between beta-blocker continuation and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.60; 95% CI, 0.30-1.20; p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Continuation of chronic beta-blockers in a broad population of patients admitted with suspected infection was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Our findings support the need for controlled experimental studies evaluating the role of chronic beta-blocker continuation among patients hospitalized with possible sepsis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007229
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuing Vs. Withholding Home Beta-Blockers at Admission for Suspected Infection: A Target Trial Emulation

Andrew J. Admon, Nathaniel Christian‐Miller, Sardar Ansari, Kareem Ballut et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Continuing Vs. Withholding Home Beta-Blockers at Admission for Suspected Infection: A Target Trial Emulation

Andrew J. Admon, Nathaniel Christian‐Miller, Sardar Ansari, Kareem Ballut, Chang, M W Sjoding, S P Taylor, Thomas Cascino, Kathleen Tiffany Lee, Raymond Pashun, Max Nagle
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Beta-blockers are commonly prescribed for chronic cardiovascular diseases. Despite potential benefits in septic shock, beta-blockers are often held at hospital admission for patients with suspected infection and possible sepsis. We compared the effects of chronic beta-blocker continuation vs. discontinuation on 90-day all-cause mortality among patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected infection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the target trial emulation framework. We used Cox regression to compare 90-day mortality between treatment groups, with inverse probability of treatment weights to account for baseline differences in sex, race, ethnicity, age, body mass index, presence of a "do not resuscitate" order, comorbidities, and acute illness severity. SETTING: A single large, academic, tertiary care emergency department in the Midwest United States. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years or older on beta-blockers prior to admission hospitalized for suspected infection (defined by orders for blood cultures and broad-spectrum antibiotics). Patients with shock, heart rates less than 40 or greater than 120, or who required an IV beta- or calcium channel blocker at a clinician's discretion were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Continuation of oral beta-blockers within 48 hours of admission vs. no continuation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 4635 eligible patients, 1172 (25.3%) received an oral beta-blocker, whereas 3463 (74.7%) did not receive an oral beta-blocker. Beta-blocker continuation was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality within 90 days of hospital admission (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; p = 0.03) and shorter hospital stay (incidence rate ratio 0.39; 95% CI, 0.38-0.41; p < 0.001). There was no significant association between beta-blocker continuation and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.60; 95% CI, 0.30-1.20; p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Continuation of chronic beta-blockers in a broad population of patients admitted with suspected infection was associated with improved clinical outcomes. Our findings support the need for controlled experimental studies evaluating the role of chronic beta-blocker continuation among patients hospitalized with possible sepsis.

Critical Care Medicine
University of Michigan (US), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US), Michigan Medicine (US), VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.