Noninferiority of Randomly Assigned Telehealth and Center-Based Regional Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs When Delivered With High Fidelity

PURPOSE: Telehealth-delivered exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (ExCRP) enhance enrollment but lack objectively measured exercise volume to facilitate valid assessment of program effectiveness. The aim of this project was to explore whether changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following telehealth ExCRP are noninferior to center-based ExCRP when delivered with comparable fidelity. METHODS: Adults with coronary heart disease randomly allocated to telehealth or center-based ExCRP were prescribed 30 minutes of continuous aerobic exercise on 3 days per week for 6 weeks, supported by weekly motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy sessions. Outcomes assessed at baseline and completion of ExCRP included peak oxygen uptake (), exercise volume, cardiovascular function, sleep quality, and quality of life. A between-group difference in of less than 3.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 was hypothesized to demonstrate noninferiority. RESULTS: Telehealth was noninferior to center-based ExCRP (95% confidence interval, -1.6 to 1.3 mL·kg-1·min-1). There was a significant time effect on in the ExCRP group (F1,47 = 13.800, P > .001, η2 = 0.227). Exercise sessions (t47 = 0.337, P = .738) and intensity (t47 = -0.645, P = .207) were equivalent, while the telehealth group exceeded prescribed exercise duration (40 ± 9 vs 30 ± 0 minute; t47 = -5.077, P < .001). Time effect was observed for quality of life (F1,47 ≥ 4.249, P ≤ .045) and vascular augmentation index (F1,45 = 6.781, P = .012). No significant differences existed in heart rate variability or actigraphy sleep assessment (F1,47 ≤ 1.436, P > .237). CONCLUSION: When completed with equivalent exercise intensity and sessional adherence, telehealth ExCRP is noninferior to center-based ExCRP for effect on cardiorespiratory fitness. Wearable activity monitoring combined with motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy can support the delivery of high-fidelity ExCRP in regional populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hcr.0000000000001035
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Noninferiority of Randomly Assigned Telehealth and Center-Based Regional Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs When Delivered With High Fidelity

Blake E. G. Collins, Lisa C. Hanson, Jayden Hunter, Daniel W. T. Wundersitz et al.
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Noninferiority of Randomly Assigned Telehealth and Center-Based Regional Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs When Delivered With High Fidelity

Blake E. G. Collins, Lisa C. Hanson, Jayden Hunter, Daniel W. T. Wundersitz, Brett A. Gordon, Michael Kingsley
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Telehealth-delivered exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs (ExCRP) enhance enrollment but lack objectively measured exercise volume to facilitate valid assessment of program effectiveness. The aim of this project was to explore whether changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following telehealth ExCRP are noninferior to center-based ExCRP when delivered with comparable fidelity. METHODS: Adults with coronary heart disease randomly allocated to telehealth or center-based ExCRP were prescribed 30 minutes of continuous aerobic exercise on 3 days per week for 6 weeks, supported by weekly motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy sessions. Outcomes assessed at baseline and completion of ExCRP included peak oxygen uptake (), exercise volume, cardiovascular function, sleep quality, and quality of life. A between-group difference in of less than 3.5 mL·kg-1·min-1 was hypothesized to demonstrate noninferiority. RESULTS: Telehealth was noninferior to center-based ExCRP (95% confidence interval, -1.6 to 1.3 mL·kg-1·min-1). There was a significant time effect on in the ExCRP group (F1,47 = 13.800, P > .001, η2 = 0.227). Exercise sessions (t47 = 0.337, P = .738) and intensity (t47 = -0.645, P = .207) were equivalent, while the telehealth group exceeded prescribed exercise duration (40 ± 9 vs 30 ± 0 minute; t47 = -5.077, P < .001). Time effect was observed for quality of life (F1,47 ≥ 4.249, P ≤ .045) and vascular augmentation index (F1,45 = 6.781, P = .012). No significant differences existed in heart rate variability or actigraphy sleep assessment (F1,47 ≤ 1.436, P > .237). CONCLUSION: When completed with equivalent exercise intensity and sessional adherence, telehealth ExCRP is noninferior to center-based ExCRP for effect on cardiorespiratory fitness. Wearable activity monitoring combined with motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy can support the delivery of high-fidelity ExCRP in regional populations.

Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
University of Auckland (NZ), La Trobe University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.