Body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival in non-metastatic colorectal cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis (OCTOPUS)

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to disentangle whether elevated body mass index (BMI) is directly associated with adverse survival in primary colorectal cancer (CRC), or indirectly through treatment-related mechanisms, e.g., dose-capping adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and toxicity, using individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) and causal inference approaches. METHODS: Using BMI from four CRC-ACT randomised trials [OCTOPUS], and two ACT adherence measures (average cumulative relative dose [ACRD]; average relative dose intensity [ARDI]), we performed two-stage random effects IPD-MA, assessing total (TE) and direct effects (DE) (excluding and including mediators, respectively) of pre-defined causal paths, with overall survival (OS) as primary outcome. FINDINGS: BMI increments was a significant ACRD reduction (-1.15% [95% CI -1.92, -0.38]), and ACRD 5% increments were associated with improved OS (HR 0.94 [0.91, 0.96]), implying possible adverse indirect effects; though not large enough to induce an adverse TE of BMI on OS (HR 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]). BMI-ARDI relationships were similar (TE -1.08% [-1.44, -0.72]), but ARDI-OS relationships were inverted (HR 1.05 [1.01, 1.09]). BMI showed no association with grade 3+ toxicity (OR 1.01 (0.91, 1.14)). However, toxicity was associated with worse OS (TE HR 1.37 [1.17, 1.61]), which attenuated on adjusting for ACRD (DE HR 1.20 [1.02, 1.41]), suggesting partial mediation via a significant toxicity-ACRD relationship (-10.37% [-11.77, -8.97]). CONCLUSION: Our study establishes possible adverse indirect effects of obesity on CRC survival, through treatment-selection, supporting full BSA-based ACT dosing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-026-03472-4
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival in non-metastatic colorectal cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis (OCTOPUS)

Hui Guo, Andrea Harkin, Lee Malcomson, Rob Glynne‐Jones et al.
British Journal of Cancer
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival in non-metastatic colorectal cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis (OCTOPUS)

Hui Guo, Andrea Harkin, Lee Malcomson, Rob Glynne‐Jones, Timothy Iveson, Jorge Barriuso, Corinna Slawinski, Andrew G. Renehan, Cornelis J. H. van de Velde, Richard Emsley, Richard D. Riley
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to disentangle whether elevated body mass index (BMI) is directly associated with adverse survival in primary colorectal cancer (CRC), or indirectly through treatment-related mechanisms, e.g., dose-capping adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and toxicity, using individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) and causal inference approaches. METHODS: Using BMI from four CRC-ACT randomised trials [OCTOPUS], and two ACT adherence measures (average cumulative relative dose [ACRD]; average relative dose intensity [ARDI]), we performed two-stage random effects IPD-MA, assessing total (TE) and direct effects (DE) (excluding and including mediators, respectively) of pre-defined causal paths, with overall survival (OS) as primary outcome. FINDINGS: BMI increments was a significant ACRD reduction (-1.15% [95% CI -1.92, -0.38]), and ACRD 5% increments were associated with improved OS (HR 0.94 [0.91, 0.96]), implying possible adverse indirect effects; though not large enough to induce an adverse TE of BMI on OS (HR 0.98 [0.90, 1.07]). BMI-ARDI relationships were similar (TE -1.08% [-1.44, -0.72]), but ARDI-OS relationships were inverted (HR 1.05 [1.01, 1.09]). BMI showed no association with grade 3+ toxicity (OR 1.01 (0.91, 1.14)). However, toxicity was associated with worse OS (TE HR 1.37 [1.17, 1.61]), which attenuated on adjusting for ACRD (DE HR 1.20 [1.02, 1.41]), suggesting partial mediation via a significant toxicity-ACRD relationship (-10.37% [-11.77, -8.97]). CONCLUSION: Our study establishes possible adverse indirect effects of obesity on CRC survival, through treatment-selection, supporting full BSA-based ACT dosing.

British Journal of Cancer
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King's College London (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, World Cancer Research Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.