Paper CLXVII: One-Octonion Recasting the Cooper Pair Exclusion Sum Rule: Tan Contact Separation in 2D, Qualitative Support from Daix

ERRATUM (2026-06-09). CLXVII-1 (the 'clean zero-parameter 3D test' I3D*kF^2 = pi(xi*kF)^2 vs Ku+2012) is WITHDRAWN, on three independent grounds: (1) dimensional inconsistency (I3D = integral d3r has units length^3, so I3D*kF^2 is a length, not the dimensionless RHS; correct group is I3D*kF^3); (2) false premise -- it assumes g_updown(r->0)->0, but the exact Tan relation g2_updown=(I/16pi^2)(1/r^2 - 2/ar) DIVERGES as 1/r^2, so the integral is contact-contaminated; (3) Ku+2012 is a thermodynamic EoS measurement with no real-space g(r) to integrate. CLXVII-2 (the 2D dip-only, one-parameter ~15% qualitative support) stands. Files: original paper + erratum. ---- Paper CLXVI proposed the excluded-area sum rule R [1 −gpair(r)] d2r = πξ2 for the strongly-interacting Fermi gas, motivated by bulk-channel exclusion of Cooper pairs in the brane-bulk framework. Direct application to the 2D AFQMC data of Daix et al. (2026, PRL 136, 153402; arXiv:2504.01885) reveals a subtlety: in 2D, the pair correlation g↑↓(r →0) diverges logarithmically (as log2(kF r), following Werner & Castin 2012, their Eq. 8), rather than vanishing. The integrand 1 −g↑↓therefore mixes two physically distinct contributions: (i) intra-pair two-body physics controlled by the Tan contact C, and (ii) inter-pair exclusion — the actual prediction of the framework. We recast CLXVI-1 into two predictions: CLXVII-1 (clean, 3D): I3D · k2 F = π(ξ · kF )2 with ξ determined independently from the Tan contact, testable against Ku et al. (2012, MIT unitary gas) data; and CLXVII-2 (2D dip region only): Idip ·k2 F ≈π(ξexcl ·kF )2 restricted to g < 1. Applied to Daix et al. 2026 at crossover η ≡log(kF a2D) = 1.0–1.2, the triangular- dip integral evaluates to Idip · k2 F ≈2.76, matching π(ξkF )2 ≈2.77 for ξkF ≈0.94–1.0 — qualitative support within ∼15% without any free parameter. The 20–22% BCS violation (pair dip depth) and the location kF r ∼2 are both consistent with bulk-channel exclusion. The clean zero-parameter test requires 3D unitary gas data. Part of the One-Octonion Brane-Bulk Framework series. Anchor DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19120873. Community: one-octonion-brane-bulk. Author: Bharathi Dasan Jagadeesan, M.D., University of Minnesota. ORCID: 0000-0002-1143-941X.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20617427
Primary Topic
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Paper CLXVII: One-Octonion Recasting the Cooper Pair Exclusion Sum Rule: Tan Contact Separation in 2D, Qualitative Support from Daix

Bharathi Jagadeesan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
preprint

Paper CLXVII: One-Octonion Recasting the Cooper Pair Exclusion Sum Rule: Tan Contact Separation in 2D, Qualitative Support from Daix

Bharathi Jagadeesan
preprint en

Abstract

ERRATUM (2026-06-09). CLXVII-1 (the 'clean zero-parameter 3D test' I3D*kF^2 = pi(xi*kF)^2 vs Ku+2012) is WITHDRAWN, on three independent grounds: (1) dimensional inconsistency (I3D = integral d3r has units length^3, so I3D*kF^2 is a length, not the dimensionless RHS; correct group is I3D*kF^3); (2) false premise -- it assumes g_updown(r->0)->0, but the exact Tan relation g2_updown=(I/16pi^2)(1/r^2 - 2/ar) DIVERGES as 1/r^2, so the integral is contact-contaminated; (3) Ku+2012 is a thermodynamic EoS measurement with no real-space g(r) to integrate. CLXVII-2 (the 2D dip-only, one-parameter ~15% qualitative support) stands. Files: original paper + erratum. ---- Paper CLXVI proposed the excluded-area sum rule R [1 −gpair(r)] d2r = πξ2 for the strongly-interacting Fermi gas, motivated by bulk-channel exclusion of Cooper pairs in the brane-bulk framework. Direct application to the 2D AFQMC data of Daix et al. (2026, PRL 136, 153402; arXiv:2504.01885) reveals a subtlety: in 2D, the pair correlation g↑↓(r →0) diverges logarithmically (as log2(kF r), following Werner & Castin 2012, their Eq. 8), rather than vanishing. The integrand 1 −g↑↓therefore mixes two physically distinct contributions: (i) intra-pair two-body physics controlled by the Tan contact C, and (ii) inter-pair exclusion — the actual prediction of the framework. We recast CLXVI-1 into two predictions: CLXVII-1 (clean, 3D): I3D · k2 F = π(ξ · kF )2 with ξ determined independently from the Tan contact, testable against Ku et al. (2012, MIT unitary gas) data; and CLXVII-2 (2D dip region only): Idip ·k2 F ≈π(ξexcl ·kF )2 restricted to g < 1. Applied to Daix et al. 2026 at crossover η ≡log(kF a2D) = 1.0–1.2, the triangular- dip integral evaluates to Idip · k2 F ≈2.76, matching π(ξkF )2 ≈2.77 for ξkF ≈0.94–1.0 — qualitative support within ∼15% without any free parameter. The 20–22% BCS violation (pair dip depth) and the location kF r ∼2 are both consistent with bulk-channel exclusion. The clean zero-parameter test requires 3D unitary gas data. Part of the One-Octonion Brane-Bulk Framework series. Anchor DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19120873. Community: one-octonion-brane-bulk. Author: Bharathi Dasan Jagadeesan, M.D., University of Minnesota. ORCID: 0000-0002-1143-941X.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Minnesota System (US)
Reduced inequalities
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.