Past, present and future of incremental peritoneal dialysis

Abstract Peritoneal dialysis (PD) provides an effective, home-based and cost-efficient treatment option, but is underutilised owing to concerns about treatment burden and complications. Contemporary priorities from international guidelines emphasise quality of life, attainment of life goals and reduced treatment burden, particularly during the first months after PD initiation, when risks of complications, haemodialysis transfer and death are the highest. Despite this, most patients begin PD on standardised ‘full-dose’ regimens, imposing substantial time demands, potential for accelerated glucose‑related metabolic harm, peritoneal inflammation and loss of residual kidney function (RKF). Incremental PD can be defined as the initiation of PD at a lower than standard ‘full dose’ supported by residual kidney function and has garnered PD clinician interest worldwide. Incremental PD has been proposed as an approach to reduce early treatment burden, limit exposure to glucose degradation products (GDP), decrease environmental waste and improve resource utilisation. However, the current evidence base is heterogeneous and predominantly observational, with inconsistent definitions of ‘incremental’ versus ‘full‑dose’ PD that limit cross-study comparability. Consequently, the purported advantages of incremental PD, including improved preservation of residual kidney function and enhanced patient experience through greater life participation, remain uncertain. This review synthesises the conceptual rationale, current evidence and patient‑important considerations for incremental PD and outlines priorities for rigorous, adequately powered randomised trials to determine when, how and for whom incremental PD should be implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renal Replacement Therapy
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-026-00733-z
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Past, present and future of incremental peritoneal dialysis

Cameron Burnett, Mary Ann Nicdao, Yeoungjee Cho, Ashik Hayat et al.
Renal Replacement Therapy
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Past, present and future of incremental peritoneal dialysis

Cameron Burnett, Mary Ann Nicdao, Yeoungjee Cho, Ashik Hayat, Katrina Chau, Na Jiang, Maddison Taylor, Rathika Krishnasamy, Melissa Cheetham, David J. Johnson, Louis L. Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Peritoneal dialysis (PD) provides an effective, home-based and cost-efficient treatment option, but is underutilised owing to concerns about treatment burden and complications. Contemporary priorities from international guidelines emphasise quality of life, attainment of life goals and reduced treatment burden, particularly during the first months after PD initiation, when risks of complications, haemodialysis transfer and death are the highest. Despite this, most patients begin PD on standardised ‘full-dose’ regimens, imposing substantial time demands, potential for accelerated glucose‑related metabolic harm, peritoneal inflammation and loss of residual kidney function (RKF). Incremental PD can be defined as the initiation of PD at a lower than standard ‘full dose’ supported by residual kidney function and has garnered PD clinician interest worldwide. Incremental PD has been proposed as an approach to reduce early treatment burden, limit exposure to glucose degradation products (GDP), decrease environmental waste and improve resource utilisation. However, the current evidence base is heterogeneous and predominantly observational, with inconsistent definitions of ‘incremental’ versus ‘full‑dose’ PD that limit cross-study comparability. Consequently, the purported advantages of incremental PD, including improved preservation of residual kidney function and enhanced patient experience through greater life participation, remain uncertain. This review synthesises the conceptual rationale, current evidence and patient‑important considerations for incremental PD and outlines priorities for rigorous, adequately powered randomised trials to determine when, how and for whom incremental PD should be implemented.

Renal Replacement TherapyVol. 12(1)
Shanghai University (CN), Translational Research Institute (AU), Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Logan Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Blacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Waitemata District Health Board (NZ), Sunshine Coast University Hospital (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Australian Government, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.