Public Opinion About Community Participation in Natural Resources Governance: A Population Survey in Indonesia and Malaysia

ABSTRACT The international conservation and natural resources communities have increasingly embraced the principle of community participation. This rhetoric around participation has gained power and influence in setting countries' agendas for natural resources governance, largely without a sound understanding of public opinion on the issues. As such, this paper seeks to better understand public opinion about community participation in natural resources management and decision‐making, and the factors underpinning those opinions. We draw on a large quantitative population survey in Indonesia and Malaysia to examine views on who should participate in forest management, how actively communities should participate in decision‐making, and how geography, experiences, and other social factors affect these views. Our study shows that over half (59%) of respondents prefer that local people be involved in forest management and taught any skills they need, whereas 41% prioritize managers with existing skills. Almost half of participants also indicate that communities should be actively involved in decisions that affect their lives (43%). However, perceptions about participation varied significantly with experiences and other social factors. For example, proximity to forests was associated with prioritizing local involvement; conversely, those most familiar with forest regulations preferred involving people with existing necessary skills. Overall, these findings demonstrate how perspectives about participation are not universally held across populations. This highlights the importance of considering perspectives from diverse social groups when designing and enacting participatory mechanisms within natural resources policies, and exploring how opportunities and capacity to participate are understood and valued by those on the front lines of implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Governance
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70109
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Opinion About Community Participation in Natural Resources Governance: A Population Survey in Indonesia and Malaysia

Rachel Friedman, Emily Massingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Angela J. Dean
Environmental Policy and Governance
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Public Opinion About Community Participation in Natural Resources Governance: A Population Survey in Indonesia and Malaysia

Rachel Friedman, Emily Massingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Angela J. Dean
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The international conservation and natural resources communities have increasingly embraced the principle of community participation. This rhetoric around participation has gained power and influence in setting countries' agendas for natural resources governance, largely without a sound understanding of public opinion on the issues. As such, this paper seeks to better understand public opinion about community participation in natural resources management and decision‐making, and the factors underpinning those opinions. We draw on a large quantitative population survey in Indonesia and Malaysia to examine views on who should participate in forest management, how actively communities should participate in decision‐making, and how geography, experiences, and other social factors affect these views. Our study shows that over half (59%) of respondents prefer that local people be involved in forest management and taught any skills they need, whereas 41% prioritize managers with existing skills. Almost half of participants also indicate that communities should be actively involved in decisions that affect their lives (43%). However, perceptions about participation varied significantly with experiences and other social factors. For example, proximity to forests was associated with prioritizing local involvement; conversely, those most familiar with forest regulations preferred involving people with existing necessary skills. Overall, these findings demonstrate how perspectives about participation are not universally held across populations. This highlights the importance of considering perspectives from diverse social groups when designing and enacting participatory mechanisms within natural resources policies, and exploring how opportunities and capacity to participate are understood and valued by those on the front lines of implementation.

Environmental Policy and Governance
Australian National University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.