Perspectives on AI in College Admissions and the Future of Higher Education

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into college admissions, it raises questions about trust, fairness, and transparency. This study examines how undergraduate students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill perceive AI in admissions, focusing on awareness, trust, perceived benefits and risks, and concerns about equity. Using survey data and open-ended responses, the findings show that students hold nuanced and cautious views. While respondents recognize AI’s potential to improve efficiency and manage large applicant pools, they express concerns about bias, inaccuracy, and reduced human involvement. Students are more comfortable with AI in supportive roles than in decision-making positions, and most prefer a model in which human judgment remains central. Limited awareness of AI use also shaped perceptions of fairness and legitimacy. Overall, acceptance of AI in admissions is conditional and depends on transparency, accountability, and meaningful human oversight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/apzf-aq14
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on AI in College Admissions and the Future of Higher Education

Hannah Adams
UNC Libraries
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Perspectives on AI in College Admissions and the Future of Higher Education

Hannah Adams
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into college admissions, it raises questions about trust, fairness, and transparency. This study examines how undergraduate students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill perceive AI in admissions, focusing on awareness, trust, perceived benefits and risks, and concerns about equity. Using survey data and open-ended responses, the findings show that students hold nuanced and cautious views. While respondents recognize AI’s potential to improve efficiency and manage large applicant pools, they express concerns about bias, inaccuracy, and reduced human involvement. Students are more comfortable with AI in supportive roles than in decision-making positions, and most prefer a model in which human judgment remains central. Limited awareness of AI use also shaped perceptions of fairness and legitimacy. Overall, acceptance of AI in admissions is conditional and depends on transparency, accountability, and meaningful human oversight.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspectives on AI in College Admissions and the Future of Higher Education — Hannah Adams · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS